PLAGIARISM FREE WRITING SERVICE
We accept
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
100%
QUALITY

Defining Contentment And What Makes A Good Life Philosophy Essay

Everyone should want to live the "good life. " Along with achieving the "good life" there are extensive definitions and interpretations of getting there. People all over the world strive to live the "good life" every day. What may appear ordinary and uninteresting to someone is actually a dream or illusion for a person who is less fortunate. You will find two great days and nights in a person's life- the day he is given birth to and your day he discovers why he was born. In other words, when he discovers what he was meant to do with his life. There are plenty of people who have a want to live the "good life" and really make the the majority of the fun open to them. People who have resided the "good life" by my meaning which is one which has a balanced lifestyle, achieved goals and dreams which are beneficial to a person and themselves, an education, and finally having steadiness through associations, work, health, and money include Aristotle and Plato. Plato and Aristotle each got ideas on how to proceed with improving the society in which these were part of during their lifetime. It's important therefore to analyze their different theoretical approaches regarding their philosophical perspectives.

A child in the less-developed parts Africa could only imagine living the life we live. They would see the "good life" as having an education, a safe destination to live, clean water and food, and a far more promising future. These things receive to us and should be integrated into our lives. Instead, we often find ourselves complaining about devoid of brand clothes, or not venturing out to eat, or needing to do homework.

Many efforts have been made throughout history to raised define the word happiness, and the two best-known philosophers in history, Plato and Aristotle, spent much of their studies on the subject. A good and happy life is one where pleasures outweigh the discomfort overall. Many questions have been asked about the good life and enjoyment. People always answer those questions with their lives, and we see numerous ideas of the nice life and delight participating in out in the strivings of mankind to live well and be happy. Both Plato and Aristotle felt that joy was a key point of life. Plato's notion of contentment was significantly different from people that have normal views. He spent as enough time undermining the traditional knowledge of the "good life" as to talking about his own conception. Plato considered happiness as a state of flawlessness that is hard to apprehend because it is based on metaphysical presuppositions that appear unclear for typical understanding. Aristotle speaks of the "good life" as the happy life; he does not mean that the "good life" is merely one of sense happy or amused. Alternatively, as the "good life" for one is the dynamic life of performing well in those ways that are crucial and unique to humans. Aristotle's idea of the "good life" is nearly the same as mine because my definition the "good life" is merely one with balanced lifestyle, accomplished goals and dreams, receiving an education, and steadiness in all aspects of life. These similarities and differences can be viewed by exploring what Aristotle and Plato educated.

Both Aristotle and Plato see the "good life" as the state of hawaii when a person displays total virtue. A virtue is total moral quality. However, these philosophers disagree on this is of virtue, and its relevance to joy. Virtue can be an essential element of the good life corresponding to Aristotle. The "good life" can't be discovered with virtue because being virtuous is steady with leading an inactive domicile or with battling greatly. As Plato reasoned, total virtue shows only once his wishes have been extinguished. Aristotle argues that the "good life" is different for each specific because each individual will have different virtues. Plato recognizes the "good life" as being achieved through the perfect love and lack of desire, while Aristotle thinks that the "good life" is achieved through the perfect declare that causes its residents to act upon their virtues Aristotle's ideas seem more sensible and simpler to follow whereas Plato's works seem more complicated.

Many people are unsatisfied because they neglect to set or try to achieve goals. One must set new goals for themselves and take action daily towards it's success. Being true to oneself is crucial when setting up goals. One must keep in mind in order to reside the "good life" the goals made should maintain positivity so after they are achieved, only good stuff will come out of it. The worst part of life is to live with what others say. Plato said, "Apply yourself both now and within the next life. Without effort, you can't be prosperous. Although land be good, You should not have an enormous crop without cultivation. " You need to exist on one's own terms and should always remember that it is possible to live on one's dreams. Aristotle said, "Everyone who are able to live according to his own choice should take up some goal for the nice life. . . be it honor or reputation or prosperity or culture-a goal that he will retain in view in all his actions" (Mintoff 159). Ultimate enjoyment occurs whenever a person's actions and goals which are virtuous.

The effects of lack of motivation have a poor effect on people. One will skip the sense of achievement and the satisfaction that comes with succeeding on a huge scale. He'll also lose the value of his peers and you will be excluded from the winner's circle. He will no more feel in control of his own destiny and in truth be a victim of circumstance. He will have a tendency to earn far less than folks of lesser cleverness and potential. One will also get worried about the near future because they fear they may not have the ability to package with things.

In 2006, the movie, The Quest for Happiness, premiered. This movie was based on the true story of Christopher Gardner's life. Gardner was a dazzling and talented used salesman. He prolonged to have difficulty making ends meet, Gardner found himself and his five-year-old son evicted using their company SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA apartment with nowhere going. He and his son endured many hardships, including moving into shelters and in public restrooms. In pursuit of his dream of a much better life for the two of them, Gardner arrived an internship at a renowned stock brokerage firm. Although there is no salary, he accepted with the hope that he'll end the program with a job and a promising future. He persisted to honor his commitment as a adoring and caring daddy, using the devotion and trust his boy has positioned in him as an impetus to get over the road blocks he faced. Around the last day of the internship, he was called into an office. Chris was informed him that he has been a great trainee.

Aristotle required on a task similar in some respects to the main one Plato conveyed out in the Republic. One of Plato's main points is that it is a great benefit to set up a hierarchical purchasing of the elements in one's heart and soul, "Unlike Aristotle, who bring philosophy back again to earth, Plato held that the unseen, heavenly, eternal things are more real that the items of our world, " (Boyleston) and he shows how the traditional virtues can be interpreted to nurture or show the proper relationship between reason and less logical components of the psyche. Aristotle's function discussion shows in an over-all way our good is based on the power of reason, and the specific studies of the particular virtues disclose how each of them involves the correct kind of ordering of the heart.

Aristotle's goal was to come to conclusions like Plato's, but without relying upon the Platonic metaphysics that takes on a simple role in the argument of the Republic. The term metaphysics is defined as the study or theory of reality sometimes used more narrowly to make reference to transcendent reality, that is, simple fact which sits beyond the physical world and cannot therefore be grasped by means of the senses. Plato assumed in an inside out view of metaphysics which shows two realms to our reality the world of changing, becoming things and a realm of set, and being varieties, which can be unchanging and that all things owe their simple fact. Aristotle found in his outside in view, that there was only one level to your reality which in it forms are found only within particular things, that have both form and matter. If there have been not individual rounded things, there would be no such thing as the Form roundness. Varieties do not exist separately or apart from particulars. Roundness, for example, has no independent existence aside from particular circular things. One cannot think the proper execution roundness without thinking of a particular spherical thing.

The need for education cannot be measured because it decides ones future. Its value is unmatchable. Without it, you will see ignorance, stress, anger, and demise. With it, solutions, alternatives, and new ideas can be brought forth to further improve life itself. John Milton said, "Nevertheless to write now the reforming of Education, though it be one of the biggest and noblest designs that can be thought on, and for the want whereof this Land perishes. . . the data and the utilization of which, cannot but be a great furtherance both to the enlargement of real truth, and honest living, with a lot more tranquility. " (Milton 96). We'd not let uneducated officials run our country. Even as learn from our mistakes, we are able to improve the the next time around. Without education, improvement and improvement would never be performed. There is no greater goal than using the mind to everyone's best edge because this can be a gift distributed by God. Plato explained in the Republic, "If the mind's eyes rests on items illuminated by real truth and reality, it comprehends and comprehends them, and functions intelligently; but when it changes to the twilight world of change and decay, it can only just form viewpoints, its vision is confused and its beliefs shifting, and it seems to lack cleverness" (Plato).

Both Plato and Aristotle agree that a good education is the way to attain virtue, nevertheless they disagree about how a person should be informed because of his differing views on the cause of virtue. Because of the method of education only one's probable can be used to maximum extent. Education shows how to think, how to work properly, and steps to make decisions. Through acquiring an education, you can make another identification. Aristotle rejects the existence of Plato's forms generally and the proper execution of the good in particular; and he rejects the idea that to be remembered as totally virtuous one must analyze mathematics and the sciences, to see all branches of knowledge as a unified overall. Aristotle said, "Education is an ornament in success and a refuge in adversity. " Aristotle presumed that education should commence from birth and really should require changing the child's practices and building his reason so that his characteristics, habits, and reason will align. Plato presumed that virtue originates from an understanding of true beauty, which is available only in the bigger plane of the world. Plato also believes that education should commence when the kid is ready to love another. A very important effect of education is ingenuity. Creativity can build a bridge among seemingly different ideas of information or knowledge.

People without morals won't do beneficial deeds in their life. Too little morals in life is a huge problem. A person without morals is person who does not caution to help others, who does not care to put themselves in other's shoes, and who believes he is superior to everyone else. That is a common characteristic in prosperous people as well. However, not all wealthy people are such as this. Those who are will never really know what it is similar to to live on a life a poor person lives, nor will they get worried. They do not think it is necessary to share with the poor because they feel it is their own money. A person with a lack of morals cannot tell the difference between right and wrong. They haven't been taught or never recognized true morals. "He that has increased the virtue or advanced the contentment of one fellow-creature, he that has ascertained an individual moral proposition, or added one useful experiment to natural knowledge, may be contented with his own performance, and, with respect to mortals like himself, may demand, like Augustus, to be dismissed at his departure with applause" (Johnson 122).

Lack of morals connects to the reasons why people make bad decisions in life. When people do drugs and drink uncontrollably, they see little or nothing incorrect with it because no one told them it was wrong. If indeed they were advised, they dismissed those who tried to save lots of them from a life of failure. It is unhappy to start to see the amount of people who've addictions to certain things and rely on those things for success. However, these addictions will never help, rather it'll injure them and effect he people around them as well. Lack of morals also contributes to violence. Without apparent morals people would just decide on violence in stressful situations. It really is a proven idea that lack of morals contributes to offense. Mary Wollstonecraft said, "And, if you are examining your center, if it could not be too much like numerical drudgery, to which a fine thoughts very reluctantly stoops, enquire further, how it is constant with the vulgar notions of credibility, and the foundation of morality--truth; for a guy to feature his virtue and independence, when he cannot ignore that he's at this time enjoying the salary of falsehood; which, in a skulking, unmanly way, he has secured himself a pension of fifteen hundred pounds per annum on the Irish establishment?" (Wollstonecraft 129). It really is morals that will make somebody who they can be.

A well-balanced lifestyle is essential in living the "good life. " One's lifestyle comprises of everything he does indeed for example, work, school, social life, and of course personal time. A well-balanced lifestyle is a collection of all the activities and places that characterize who one is as a person. One's lifestyle has an emotional impact on. If one's lifestyle's net result leaves him sensing bad about himself then changes in it are needed. In any other case, it can lead to stress and unhappiness. If one can hold all his activities and fit them in his plan allowing period to relax and do things for himself, not only will he be happy but everyone around him will be as well. If one's lifestyle isn't balanced, he could find great stress-reduction benefits in going for a thorough inventory of his life and how he spends his time, and making changes. First, one must determine which areas were missing, and then focus on accumulating those areas. Stress is a normal physical response to events that produce one feel threatened or upset one's balance for some reason. If one dwells more than a demanding situation not only will they have the ability to see the good out of the situation but it could also lead to pain of any kind, heart disease, sleep issues, and depression. Take into account that there's always some good atlanta divorce attorneys bad situation. To be able to live the "good life" one must have the ability to handle nerve-racking situations.

Socializing with relatives and buddies is also an important part of healthy living. Having a healthy social life means using a few close friends and confidants the particular one enjoys being with to talk about ideas, discuss important personal issues, and have a few good laughs. Being able to communicate oneself and showing feelings will help one as he's taking place with life because he will know that he has friends to speak to when times go bad. Bottling feelings inside will just damage oneself more and will not have the ability to enjoy things he used to because of whatever burden he's going through. He'll also withdraw themselves from all cultural happenings, which may give his friends the impression that something is being hidden. Keep in mind, not every detail must be shared but having the ability to reveal thoughts and emotions help one feel more relieved and often helps with taking that extra fill off one's backside. "For the purpose of living one has to presume that the personality is sound, and the "self" is an entity, also to ignore all in contrast data. And since to disregard facts is one of the characteristics of beliefs, I certainly can proclaim that I believe in personal romantic relationships" (Foster 182). Plato and Aristotle agree on the value of interpersonal relationships in the quest for the "good life. " Both concur that interpersonal relationships account for the education of individuals, but Aristotle runs further because he considers attaining the "good life" as societal.

By my classification of the "good life, " one must be positively stable in every facet of his life. Being economically stable provides a healthy and safe approach to life. Nevertheless, he will be able to support themselves and his family when it concerns food, drinking water, and shelter. Money will be a worry factor but if money is completed the correct way then it is simple to remain secure. Good, secure health maintains one's mind sharpened, doctor charges low, a longer lifespan in some instances, and enables one work more to make more money. Plato agreed with this and said, "Insufficient activity destroys the good condition of each human being,

while activity and methodical physical exercise save it and maintain it. " One must continue to be active because a inactive lifestyle is not beneficial to one's health.

The "good life" is simply success though balance, achieved goals and dreams, and a well-balanced lifestyle. Peace comes with contentment. Tranquility is achieved through balance. Stableness revolves around rationalization. The "good life" with out either element; contentment, well balanced rationalization can't be achieved in its true essence. If we began to appreciate what is directed at us we would truly see how easy it is to fully understand and live the "good life. " Let's make the best out of our life for those kids in Africa and other under-developed countries. Let's better ourselves so we can make a difference so those unprivileged people can live the "good life" as well.

It is obvious that both Plato and Aristotle experienced a different concept of the "good life, " but their ideas behind living the "good life" support my opinion. Human delight is the principal concern for both Plato and Aristotle in their works of books. Since happiness is nearly a universal emotion their conclusions on the reason for pleasure are similar. However, Plato and Aristotle are very different individuals, so the causes of their pleasure are completely different. Achieving the "good life" was looked at by both philosophers as being a life-long job with several aspects to keep in mind. Their basic conceptions and understanding of life were prominent throughout their studies of how to achieve the "good life. "

Sometimes, big results come from little causes. For example, when making breads one has to utilize flour and normal water and then he knead the dough. If he forgets to include just a little yeast, he'll finish up with an unappetizing hockey puck. A huge effect, just like a healthier person, demands a whole lot of big triggers, like eating better and exercising more often. Sometimes just a little change can make a major difference. To live a life the "good life" one must feel the whole procedure for trial and error.

More than 7 000 students trust us to do their work
90% of customers place more than 5 orders with us
Special price $5 /page
PLACE AN ORDER
Check the price
for your assignment
FREE