This newspaper will discuss a brief overview of Fidel Castro, his management styles, characteristics, and the determinants that occurred during his surge to prominence. It offers his resources of power, and additional examines his success or non effectiveness as a innovator. Research on Fidel Castro and his authority was conducted through online sources which include three academic.
What relationship could be found between the Fidel Castro, the fans, and the situation? What were his recognized negative and positive qualities? What fantastic qualities could be found within Fidel Castro?
Fidel Alejandro (Ruz) Castro was born in Biran Cuba on August 13th 1926 to Angel Castro and Lina Ruz in the Eastern Province of Cuba. Fidel was the third child of his siblings by father, Angel Castro. Although he was born out of wedlock, he was privileged to upper-middle school living environments. He was informed in a private boarding school, went to school and later went on to Harvard Laws University. At Harvard, he became engrossed in the politics weather in Cuba especially as it relates to the nationalism, anti-imperialism and socialism. (Castro's Biography, 2010)
Castro was wedded to Mirta Diaz Balart. That they had one kid whose name was Fidelito which intended "little Fidel". Her family was rich and Fidel Castro capitalized upon this opportunity and therefore was subjected to a much wealthier lifestyle and at the same time, could network with key politics associations. The matrimony finished after six years because of a lack of financial support for his family. Mirta was his second wife. (Castro's Biography, 2010)
Castro's excitement for reform and interpersonal justice led him to the Dominican Republic in an attempt to help overthrow Mr. Rafael Trujillo. Although this attempt was not successful, this did not deter him from the struggle for cultural justice. He was part of your anti communist party that was produced with the aim of exposing government problem, developing strategies to gain economic independence and implement cultural reform in Cuba.
Although his efforts to overthrow the first choice at the time, General Fulgencio Bartista failed, he never gave up. He was sentenced to jail for those attempted coups but persisted the fight to be Cuba's leader, in an effort to make the changes he was hoping to satisfy. This long have difficulties was finally came to the realization on January 1st, 1959 when he assumed the authority of the federal government. He appointed his brother, Raul Castro the duties of commander of the military on Feb 15th 1959.
"Charismatic market leaders are extremely self-confident, are highly motivated to attain and assert effect, and have strong conviction in the moral correctness of the values" (House & Aditya, p. 416). Fidel Castro is a charismatic and transformational leader. Nahavandi areas that transformational authority includes three factors, of the three we recognized these to identify Castro; charisma and intellectually simulated that alone helped Castro achieve the drastic change he form for Cuba. That is the social and politics reform he directed to accomplish as a innovator.
Were there any ethnical characteristics that helped him in command? Would he be an effective leader anywhere else?
The country's culture performed an important role in the tendencies of Fidel Castro. His personality and personality improved as he joined groups and eventually they developed their own culture. Cultural characteristics affect who we consider a powerful leader.
In Trompenaars' analysis of cross ethnic organizational culture, Castro fits in the family category which states that they are power oriented, nurturing head; he cared deeply for the poor a lot that he had taken forceful from the abundant to give to the poor of his cherished Cuba. He also was focused on building connections but these relationships shouldn't be overweighed by the outside source. We noticed he formed relationship with a number of counterparts such Che Guevara of Mexico, the Soviet Union, Grenada and Africa. (Castro's Biography, 2010 and Navandi 2009)
Castro demonstrated leadership traits very early in his years as a child. Trait theory indicates that market leaders are created not made. His characteristics as a innovator further reiterated this point. Castro had a natural ability to affect his supporters. He comprehended the folks of Cuba especially the indegent. This had a positive effect on the people of Cuba especially understanding that he was not born into an unhealthy family and was therefore for the poor.
As mentioned in the text "Contingency Time theory authority view is that personality style, habit of effective leaders depends on your situation where there are placed" (Nahavandi 2009).
This was obvious when Castro required the chance to be a liberator to the people in the time when these were very dissatisfied with the command style of the Bartista federal government. He saw an chance to gain trust and supporters, and as the individual he was took full advantage of the situation. His procedure was successful. hence the reason for the massive enthusiasts. (Castro's Biography, 2010)
Castro, because of his characteristics was deemed to become a leader, whatever the context. Research shows that Castro confirmed an A2 decision style in the normative decision making model. Nahavandi expresses that A2 leaders seek specific information however they make the decisions by itself.
As with all leaders he had both negative and positive characteristics. In researching, it was mentioned that the positive attributes at his early on stage as Cuban head outweighed the negatives. His desire helped the low class Cubans raise their degree of self-confidence. He could manage the united states well, regardless of the restrictions put from outside sources namely the United States. As a result, he remained true to his values and values. Most of all he was a challenger; he encouraged his followers, needed on great duties and showed courage when confronted with danger. In an effort to attain his goals and goals, he had taken the lead in every the coups which were attempted. He never still left his supporters to go into the battles of war by themselves.
On the other palm, he was a obstinate innovator who led with an iron fist. At times, he was believed to be over self-confident and it was due to the fact of his educational track record and experience. (Nahavandi 2009)
He was an authoritarian leader and therefore he had not been willing to simply accept change. This is evident through the early on part of his management. He was indeed coercive; he shown this habit when his subordinates were punished for not pursuing his orders.
In our research, we determined Castro as a type A head and the Nahavandi claims that the characteristics and behavior that accompany these kinds of market leaders are their need to be in control. Throughout the whole research there have been reports that stated Fidel Castro's need to get control of Cuba also to be its leader. His demonstration of poor delegation, like to work exclusively and hard working are all characteristics which he have and are characteristics of Type A market leaders. (Nahavandi 2009)
Mr. Castro is relatively medium Machiavellian because of his efficiency as a leader and has had a brief history of easily manipulating his followers in an effort to attaining his goals and aims; that was to change Cuba's political environment, caring for the needs of the indegent and get support through his message and passion for his people. Careful analysis shows that predicated on the Myer Briggs Type sign where he was a little of all the categories. For instance, as the feeling thinker he would establish rules and regulations, jump to action too quickly sometimes and press others to access the point. Others are not suited to his character. Like a sensational feeler, the most applicable is the reluctance to accept change. Inside the intuitive thinker and feeler categories, they are the two that would apply to Fidel Castro, architect of improvement and ideas and good communicator. (Nahavandi 2009)
Based on our research, Fidel Castro has displayed leadership styles of being both a charismatic and transformational head. He was more a dictator-charismatic leader. He was able to gather his followers through his charisma as opposed to gathering them through his external power of power. Fidel was always worried about the well-being of his people, especially the less fortunate ones. Thus he got away riches and property from a lot more fortunate Cubans and sent out to the less fortunate. He had a vision for the people of Cuba and so could use his eyesight through the people to expand his ability.
One of his visions was to ensure that the less fortunate possessed their essential needs. In addition, he promised the people of Cuba free education in which he delivered. Using this method he assumed that he was being very sensitive to the needs of his people. Although Fidel was a charismatic leader, he frequently exhibited a dictatorship management style. The folks of Cuba were not allowed flexibility of conversation. Under his ruling the people of Cuba were not permitted to leave Cuba for a vacation elsewhere. People who didn't support his get together were reprimanded rather than given identical opportunities. Some individuals of Cuba were even fearful to utter the name, Fidel Castro. Instead they might make a 'beard pulling sign' in order to make someone know these were discussing him. Cubans were also denied usage of certain seashores and hotels. This possessed caused insults to the people of Cuba. (Halliday, 2008).
Another aspect of management style viewed by Fidel Castro, was his capability to be a transformational leader in that he had the ability to influence his supporters ethics, prices and expectations. He also revealed deep thoughts towards his supporters. He would also articulate the issues within the system and would try to solve those problems. He also empowered his supporters by use of his own advantages and notion. (Marques, 2010)
Leaders of non-profit organizations are associated with having a social mission such as saving the surroundings, feeding the house and cover the homeless. These leaders also represent and support ideological goals. Market leaders of non-profit organizations also enjoy his/her work and hence they are motivated to execute in the best interest of the organization.
Fidel Castro viewed leadership features very early on in his youth days by demonstrating his dedication and personal- confidence. This came into being during his early childhood times when his friends belonging to the upper course in society did not include him in their many public activities. (Marques, 2010).
His leadership reflected the point of view from non-profits. Cuba is a communist country from since 1950, when Fidel Castro took over the federal government in a rebellion. The concept of communism deals with equality for many and the syndication of riches. Fidel presumed in the equality and he saw the need to meet the needs of these who had been less fortunate and those who needed to have the essential needs for success. Hence the reason why Fidel carried out free health care systems for everyone Cubans and foreigners. Today, Cuba is known for doing many major surgeries. Children are given free education in main and extra level. There exists one instructor to every ten Cuban students. Free tertiary education is also given. In conditions of infrastructure, the highways in Cuba are satisfactory, although there are inadequate public travel systems set up. (The First Post, 2010).
Communism and Socialism go together. Cuba is also termed as a socialist country. Under the socialist movements, the Cuban authorities owns the state and all its business. The socialist movement allows Cubans to acquire free usage of goods and services. The special needs of the oppressed are addressed under this system. In 1959, Fidel found the necessity to socialize the current economic climate due to economic and politics stronghold the United States of America had on Cuba. Fidel believed that the Cuba had a need to trade in order to live and under the socialist system this was possible. In so doing, the typical of living was raised by the people of Cuba. The sectors in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, officially and highly educated workforce, had placed aside Cuba from all of those other under-developed countries. These positives all occurred under the command of Fidel Castro. (Durand, 2003).
Fidel Castro was known for his authoritative authority style and for that reason did not enable participative management styles. He was very authoritative and he dictated all the regulations and procedures. He directed and managed all activities without the addition of his members of the government or the folks of Cuba on a whole. The folks of Cuba were not absolve to leave the country as they pleased. For example, heading on a a vacation to another country had not been allowed. Cubans can travel only if the government authorizes them to do so.
He did not include his ministers in his decision making process. He would make the decisions and then recommend them. They were prohibited to dispute his decisions. Fidel did not share information along with his colleagues. Therefore it was problematic for his Ministers to demonstrate their skills and talents. His ministers were not allowed to determine work schedules for the development of Cuba, neither were they given enough opportunities to make decisions about the budget for the country. Fidel and his brother Raul made a lot of those decisions. This led to his ministers and followers were not encouraged and they experienced that they were not given the possibility to participate lots of the decisions he made. Due to his command style, creativeness and creativity were two vital elements his ministers were lacking. The one time Fidel delegated his capabilities, was when he acquired tired and was struggling to rule Cuba any longer. He delegated his power to his younger sibling, Raul Castro. Raul was presented with the control by Fidel Castro. The folks of Cuba were not given the opportunity to vote for a leader. In this situation we can conclude that nepotism was a factor in his decision making. (The First post, 2010).
Participative management is vital in organizations because market leaders and managers should seek to make the most of its fans. Their fans should get the opportunity participate your choice making process. In so doing, new ideas can be developed and applied for the betterment of the business. (Creator unknown, 2010).
Fidel Castro could not be considered a head of change because he presumed that his way is the proper way and he believed in the communism notion. He wanted ability over the whole Cuban country and didn't want any intrusion from the exterior forces, especially america of America. He thought in what he stood for and was very rigid in his decision making process. His autocratic and dictatorship styles were strong signals that Fidel did not want change in his thought process and his decision making process.
Yes he required change in terms on riches and property being consistently distributed throughout the united states. When Fidel arrived to power, rent was slice by fifty percent (50%) for individuals who received low pay. He nationalized the telephone companies and the rates were cut to ensure that civilians could actually pay their domestic bill. Casinos and nightclubs were closed down by Fidel because he noticed those two establishments as corruption for the united states. A high percentage of the Cuban population was illiterate. Many individuals in rural areas could not read or write. Since Fidel required office, free education was given to all or any the folks of Cuba. In terms of medical systems, new training colleges were built for doctors. Toddler mortality rate fell when he arrived to electric power. However, he did not want change in terms of another politics get together ruling Cuba. Fidel was of the opinion that his authority style was suitable for the people of Cuba. He desired change in terms of problem. (Simkin, 2010).
Fidel was adament about left over in power without any interference from exterior options and he strongly thought that his country should be ruled how he ruled. Because of his strong will and influence on a lot of his followers, he did not desire to be removed from electric power, because he assumed that he was the best ruler for Cuba. Therefore, he did not want any changes to come about regarding his ruling or authority style. He refused to carry free elections for the folks of Cuba because he didn't want change. (Simkin, 2010)
Fidel Castro relinquished his power in Feb 2008, to his brother Raul Castro as stated earlier in this paper, the folks of Cuba were not given an possibility to vote. His brother Raul was put in his position. Lots of the people of Cuba assume that Raul has many character attributes as his brother Fidel, hence the key reason why Fidel paid capacity to him. It is thought that Fidel and Raul have a very close relationship and this Raul will follow in his footsteps.
During Fidel's guideline, Raul was your partner he would seek advice from with whenever he'd need to produce a decision. Raul, like his sibling Fidel can be involved about the syndication of food to people who face constant problems with shortages. This was also one of the factors that Fidel fought for his people. Raul under Fidel's management thought in the same. Raul presumed in the same ideologies as his sibling Fidel. He also believed that Cuba should remain a communist talk about, because communism would allow for the folks of Cuba to possess equal protection under the law. While Raul may aim to make trivial changes in Cuba, one of the factors that would stay is the animosity between Cuba and the U. S of America. It could be figured Raul being trained as leader under Fidel, this matter may take a long time to resolve, it if will be resolved whatsoever. While Fidel was at power, his brother Raul was laying the ground benefit the rebuilding of Cuba's overall economy. Fidel could suggest ideas to his brother Raul to be successful in this enterprise. (Roig-Franzia, 2008).
Fidel Castro used his proper understanding to work his way into ruling Cuba, when individuals were dissatisfied with the ruling of Batista. Today Fidel is still not liked by many Cubans because the individuals do not are in a democratic world. They aren't free to live the lives like many other civilians in other areas of the world. Due to his resilience he didn't allow the viewpoints of others which is one of the main reasons many Cubans fled the united states. His overconfidence revealed superiority in knowledge and his obstinate practices brought on him to rule with an iron fist.
The paper also defined how effective he was as a leader in terms to getting his enthusiasts to adhere to his decisions and the cultural characteristics were also looked at, and how it helped him in his management style. The ideas of early theories were also outlined and in addition the sources of power and how he used his power to influence his enthusiasts.
Fidel proved the transformational leader he was in terms of influencing his fans and watching their ethics, long-term goals and standard. Despite his autocratic ruling, he was a hard employee and he exhibited it. He also exhibited courage for the reason that he took hazards and knowing that his way may fail. Whenever he failed, he received right back up and tried again. In terms of communication, Fidel did little communication with his subordinates. He made his decisions and performed them whether or not his followers were pleased with them. He was driven, and possessed the willpower to rule Cuba and so he fought the outsiders who attempted to dominate from his ruling. He was never discouraged by setbacks. He observed setbacks as part of the learning process.
Fidel possessed both positive and negative features as a leader. This was exemplified by his way of ruling Cuba. He's a favorite politician, and will be kept in mind by the people of Cuba and the globe on a complete. He'll be kept in mind for his autocratic and dictatorship authority styles.
He will also be remembered for supporting the less fortunate people of Cuba. He was a dynamic person in the guerilla movements. This was a stepping rock to becoming political innovator of his get together and ruler of Cuba. Today, many believe his sibling Raul will rule Cuba the same way his brother did. Since Raul got over in 2008, there have never been many changes in the control style. Raul has inherited his brother's leadership features. (Marques, 2010)