The way Wilde characterized the individuals in this play, chiefly Jack Worthing, displays these folks as uptight and serious that wouldn't put a toe out of brand. This first characterization of Jack would appear to the audience a personality which should belong in a drama, but Wilde put into Jack the excess quirk to be within a handbag, and therefore not knowing who his genuine parents. Wilde did this first screen also to ridicule the Victorian dogma stressing normalcy and their frowning after that which, "seems to display a contempt for the normal decencies of family life (Girl Bracknell, Take action I, pg. 134). " Wilde uses the circumstances of Jack's abandonment to symbolize both Jack's ambiguous sociable position throughout the play and emphasize his ability to move within public circles, whether that is up or down. The purse that baby Jack is flawlessly used to symbolize this ambiguity, for this bag was has all the trademarks of normalcy:
Thus, this commonplace box contains child of uncommon origins. There is absolutely no coincidence that ordinary ladies handbag/baby box is uncovered in a cloakroom, for these bits of outfits can all be worn to conceal one's true form, face, or personality. The Victoria Stop has prevalence to the play as well. The american trail, like the Brighton line, led to the wealthier parts of London as the eastern road led to places like Chatham and Dover, which were more impoverished. Wilde uses the actual fact that the infant Jack reaches the intersection of the two lines to basically put him in an identity crisis. Does indeed he result from a poor common family or a abundant aristocratic one? Sweetheart Bracknell thought we would look on the negative part and judge him as common until proven commendable (indecently exposing Wilde's contempt for the aristocratic propriety and downright snobbishness). There may be however another, more positive way to interpret his discovery at Victoria Station. Trains are all about moving visitors to the places where they need to be. Wilde uses Jack's existence at Victoria Place to be a comment on his social status, suggesting that he has great social mobility; that he may have success in climbing the social ladder to a prestigious position. That is foreshadowed by the fact that he's found specifically on the Brighton brand, the street that brings about the richer parts of town. And even the storyline of Earnest is approximately Jack's social progression. Actually, Wilde reveals by the end that Jack is a genuine member of the aristocracy within the Moncrieff family, making him a worthy man for another aristocrat, Gwendolen. Therefore the landscape of Jack's orphaning is made up of aspects, like the ordinary bag and the cloakroom, showing that he may appear common, but with the hint of the aristocratic background, through which Wilde reveals Jack's true sociable identity.
The most prevalent reason the character types in The Need for Being Earnest lie is to escape public or familial tasks, to instead do something more enjoyable. And in addition, just a few characters hold honesty in high regard. However, the viewer can easily see how hard it is perfect for Wilde's characters to create things directly once they've lied about them. As the problem gets increasingly complicated, Wilde must weave more complex lays for his persona to get out of the tangles of the previous lies. Perhaps the most eye-catching thing is that nothing of the heroes ever shows true remorse or guilt about laying. The first types of lying are the two imaginary people created by Jack and Algernon, which Wilde uses to symbolize the empty assurances or deceit of the Victorian era. Not merely is the type Ernest not earnest for the majority of the play, but he also doesn't even really exist! This makes Jack's creation of him doubly deceitful. Bunbury appears to be as absurd and fictional as he happens to be. Both these figments of dream allow Jack and Algernon to live on a lie; in order to seem as if they uphold these high moral specifications, while the truth is are gallivanting around without struggling any repercussions. Jack can take it a lttle bit farther since he actually impersonates his so-called good-for-nothing brother. Even when Jack and Algernon are caught in their lies, they never suffer any real consequence. They can both destroy off their imaginary alter egos or friends without much to-do, shows Victorian society's real beliefs; the Victorian time didn't value credibility, responsibility, or compassion for the under-privileged (neither Woman Bracknell or Algernon show much pity for Bunbury when he "dies"), but only style, money, and aristocracy. It is appropriate that the nonexistent people of Ernest and Bunbury show how shallow are the Victorians' real concerns.
It seems that Wilde's main point in The Need for Being Earnest is to criticize Victorian culture by exhibiting how shallow and hypocritical could it be. What do aristocrats do all day long? Sit around, sipping tea, taking shallow gossip, and even gallivanting around under fake pretence. What does Female Bracknell want to see in Jack, her future son-in-law? Money, property, stylishness, and an aristocratic name. She cares little for his personality. As the play goes on and we see just how shallow everyone's wants are, and we have a tendency to laugh. Wilde will not allow his tone to get too heavy or dark. Instead, we find the personas in The Need for Being Ernest amusing.