Posted at 01.10.2018
Those who seek a finish to school assault will not think it is by travelling an individual way, nor by looking at only one sector, such as schools. The problem must be studied from a number of perspectives- familial, cultural, cultural, spiritual, communal, political, pedagogical, mental, and financial. If avoidance is preferable to cure, what exactly are the preventive actions, if any; we can take to stop assault?
I think that the essential thing that we should do is to strengthen the relations within the family. We ought to not expect tranquility outside if we don't have peace inside. Parents should find time to spend on their children daily. Children should feel wished and should be taught beliefs. For example: To value the other also to place a high premium on such principles as love, sharing, helping, politeness, courtesy. As it is said "education begins in the womb and leads to the tomb". Values are caught rather than taught, therefore parents should be "role setters" and really should refrain discussing like Jesus and behaving like Judas. The home is best place to start the beginning of a child's life. Indeed children imitate what they see and their greatest influences will be the individuals around them. Therefore parents can do a fundamental process in moulding their children's attitudes as backed by a few of our parents' in the interview.
Parents should build some kind of trust between themselves and their children. It is saddening that most parents nowadays shirk using their duties and leave everything to the institution.
Students have very important efforts to make in solving university violence. They want to increase everyone's knowing of the problems in schools. Currently, they think that men and women are clueless about the realities of school life. From my findings, pre-vocational students and parents whose wards show up at pre-vocational school claim that they should be devote a institution apart for the coffee lover and that they should be segregated from the mainstream, mainly because they face exclusion, not only from mainstream students but teachers also, and bullying. I highly believe if both of these streams are separated this may lead to a decrease in school assault.
I would also suggest that students should be involved safely planning in classes. By this, I mean that students out of every level of accomplishment have something to provide which without their addition; an important little bit of the puzzle is missing. It really is clear that students from high- attaining groups employ a different college experience than the lower-achieving students in the same school and everyone has some other experience of institution violence. Therefore, I would recommend that it's very important to heed what of students to know very well what is going on and teachers should ask students.
Our education system does cater for psychologists and communal workers in academic institutions, but not over a permanent and full time basis but only for students who've problems. I suggest that should be changed and especially in pre-vocational streams, there should be a full time psychologist and interpersonal worker to utilize these children on a regular basis to learn about the various problems they encounter at school, at home and in their communities. This is in fact from the point that I've mentioned above. Instructors also play a significant role in this as when you are in constant contact with the pupil, they will be the first someone to identify the issues with the students. After having determined the problem, the child is described the school sociable worker who will enquire on the child's parents and the surroundings he/she lives in.
The social worker then must prepare a statement on the kid and gives special focus on enabling the child's parents to be noticed on the problem also to be accepted as equal educational partners in the educational planning activities of the kid. Then the linkage can be produced whether the pupil is suffering from a communal problem or not. The interpersonal employee then with the support of the parents can send the child to another professional that can be the psychologist with respect to the problem. So, all this implies that is compulsory to own both a public employee and a psychologist working hand in hand.
Another important role of the social worker is that of a counselor whereby he has the responsibility of managing pastoral care and ensure that pupils can easily cope with anxiousness provoking situations which is very useful in working with some issues that pre-voc students come across. Also, the application of counselling skills by the cultural workers facilitates the connection among teachers and therefore the quality of human romantic relationship existing in the school.
What is also important is the fact more supervision is necessary by school personnel to curb college violence. Which means that supervision should not be restricted to the class only, but outside the school room also and in places like: Bus-stop, academic institutions lawn, restrooms and the corridors of the institution. School violence tend to take place in these places also as students know they are not supervised. In addition, there also needs to be the launch of cameras in schools where perpetrators of university violence can be easily determined.
Almost everything a kid does at university is result focused. Teachers do not ask children what they wish to do and guide them consequently. What we need can be an education which is child-centered and where in fact the student has a selection and a say in what he/she would like to do and not simply be required to do this and that. In that system where in fact the child seems that he/she is scarcely a tolerated customer and this the school is not his/her institution but belongs to the federal, to the rector and whereas for his or her part, they have no stake whatsoever in the institution, it is only natural that the pupil will vent his frustration against the institution.
Therefore, I will suggest having a kid centered education where in fact the scholar has a say and a contribution to the institution and feels a part of the family. Hence, what does a child centered school produce? It produces people who feel accountable for their own university, because of its appearance, the express of its furniture, books, toilets, pupil/teacher associations. These kids take delight in their universities and will try to improve it in all ways. And when you can check out the deplorable conditions of toilets, the catalogue and the classrooms of the pre-vocational students in their state secondary colleges, it is very surprising. Regarding this, I am going to continue the explanation in the "Good infrastructure part".
The Ministry of Education should review the code of carry out of. I would recommend a new idea of code of carry out should be unveiled where school rules and punishments are plainly explained and where importance is laid on the type of costume students wear, the accessories they deck themselves with and the king of "look" they provide themselves while approaching to schools. Dress restrictions should indeed be handled severely as from the studies we find that parent or guardian and professors say that the kind of accessories children wear to go to school are quite delinquent in the looks. Periodical overview of these restrictions for appropriateness, efficiency and completeness is vital. Students may have the rules explained to them during assemblies or in a class to be certain they understand the purpose of the rules, the guidelines of acceptable tendencies and the consequences of infractions.
A good infrastructure is vital. Esteem to students is showed through the option of good facilities and resources, such as laboratories, computer rooms, and sophisticated playgrounds. Each one of these things mentioned above are lacking in some pre-vocational streams as they promote the institution with the mainstream as has been within the conclusions that where there's a insufficient good infrastructure it leads to conflict.
So, to come to the idea above, I firmly believe the Ministry of Education should isolate the streams and allow for the pre-vocational students in a college for themselves with a good infrastructure. I assert that will produce many positive results as:
While dealing with the issue of school violence, the media should undoubtedly be considered. As has been encountered in the conclusions where people note that some videos have a really negative affect on children. So, what should the federal government do?
It is of maximum responsibility to the government to ban some movies from the marketplace and start raising campaigns of consciousness on the impact of violent films on children to educate the population. The federal government should seek the assistance of experts in communication to devise ways to present TV programmes or mag/ newspaper articles in such a way so as to condemn the violence projected. Motion pictures depicting violence shouldn't be broadcasted at peak time when children are likely to be in front of the TV. Parents should also have a control in regard the types of movies or programs their children are seeing. Very often when children have completed seeing a violent film their play becomes violent too plus they reproduce that at college. Instead, Programs on radio and tv set highlighting the disastrous effects of violence on culture should be motivated for broadcast.