Athol Fugard, who was created in Middleburg, South Africa in 1932, is a favorite realist playwright. He has written many works which echo his extreme opposition to the Apartheid system. Two such plays are 'Boesman and Lena' (1969) and 'My Children! My Africa!' (1989). Both takes on are set in apartheid South Africa and illustrate the cruelty of those years in South Africa as well as the existing issues encompassing them. Athol Fugard's work in both these works is therefore a reflection of the days and society in which he was writing. The performs' socio-political contexts and his motives in them can be independently talked about as well when compared with one another.
Boesman and Lena is set in Apartheid South Africa and is a play about a young, non-white few who are truly facing difficulties and struggling during this time. The play opens with the couple on a journey, walking from spot to place, after being forcefully taken off their home. Because they are travelling, Lena tries to recount where they are. They are able to only bring the belongings with them they can afford to transport on their backs and they also are exposed to the elements around them. As the couple are homeless, Boesman made a decision that in order to endure he needs to create a shelter out of scrap iron and other materials that he has found. After the shelter is made, he is the only one to type in it. Lena not only seems the fire but also will sit outside of the shelter for the entire play. The eager circumstances they are in highlight their depressed, isolated and impoverished devote the entire world.
Boesman and Lena was written in 1965 which really is a mere 17 years after the start of apartheid. The play clearly shows the harshness of this time period associated with the Forced Removals and Group Areas Serves, which were handed by the government to be able to attract a brand by totally separating racial groups. Boesman and Lena flawlessly represent the an incredible number of non-whites who endured during Apartheid. The pressured removals from homes and dispersal of neighborhoods led to sociable breakdown and widespread poverty in South Africa. Non-whites weren't given the opportunity to really settle down in any environment whatsoever, which caused these to be depressed and feel like that they had no interpretation whatsoever in their lives. This alienation can be mentioned when Lena is distraught after she's just been forcefully removed from her own house.
At the beginning of the play, an old man called Outa appears at their campsite. The way Boesman serves around Outa and shows his thoughts towards him show the amazingly racial tensions between your various non-white groups. "Boesman believes he's superior to Outa. He is frustrated by the situation in South Africa and he vents this stress on other non-whites. Outa, being very frail and unresponsive, is a simple focus on for Boesman, and this is evident in the way he snacks Outa. " [Mtvass]
Boesman and Lena, as well as their activities, can be interpreted as icons. Boesman's violence towards Lena presents the violence white South Africans inflict on individuals of coloring. Lena represents wish and life. She actually is optimistic and thinks things will change in the future. She is also very compassionate (as with the old man, Outa). Boesman is mostly bitter and jealous, looking to destroy any expectation and life that she's.
Fugard has noted a lot of his ideas in his notebooks. In one entry, Fugard describes that he had many encounters with the poorer South Africans. He records that these encounters all added to the creation of Boesman and Lena. He also records back on your day he arrived to contact with a specific woman which influenced him to commence writing the play. He says in Athol Fugard: Notebooks 1960-1977: "On a hot August day in 1965, Fugard and two friends were driving a car along a rural street when they found an old woman trudging along with all of her worldly belongings tied up in a lot of money on her brain. They stopped and offered her a ride. She cried at their surprising kindness, and during the fifteen-mile visit to a plantation up the street, she told them about the death of her hubby three days previously and her nine absent children. If Fugard and his companions hadn't halted to provide her a trip, she'd have implemented her intend to sleep in a stormwater drain that nighttime and continue her long voyage the next day. " [E-notes 2010]
He also provides his impression of the woman. He writes, "In that cruel walk under the blazing sun, walking from all of her life that she didn't have on her head, facing the chance of a bitter Karoo night time in a drain-pipe, in this walk there was no defeat-there was pain, and great anguish, but no defeat. '' Athol Fugard: Notebooks 1960-1977. The walk that woman went on was 'the walk' that Boesman and Lena are on throughout the play as it inspired him to create this idea in the first place.
Because Fugard passionately abhorred apartheid, his intentions in writing this play were to show what was going on in South Africa at that time and to expose the consequences of apartheid. He used symbolism-for example representing the violence white South Africans inflict on individuals of coloring through Boesman's assault towards Lena - as well as themes or templates. The primary theme of Boesman and Lena is assault and cruelty which displays the point out of apartheid at the time. In the 1960's, when the play was written, people of colour had zero power and may not do anything about how exactly they were treated. Essentially, in this play, Fugard portrayed severe real situations and viewed the struggling and hurting of the individuals and in so doing projected a genuine representation of what was going on as of this cruel amount of time in South Africa.
Fugard published 'My Children My Africa' about twenty years after Boesman and Lena was posted. At the moment, there is an huge amount of racial tension and ongoing assault, both within various dark-colored communities and violence perpetrated by the white security police force and military equipment. Life had not been the same in South Africa as it got previously experienced the 60's and things were coming to a head. There have been many anti-apartheid activities and international censure because of this. Even though confrontational violence between the government and makes of liberation possessed escalated in Apartheid South Africa, the underlying themes or templates of exploitation and real human fighting were still the same.
As historian Alistair Boddy-Evans summarized: "Through the 1970s and 80s Apartheid was reinvented - due to increasing inner and international stresses, and worsening economical difficulties. Black young ones was subjected to increasing politicisation, and found manifestation against 'Bantu education' through the 1976 Soweto Uprising. Regardless of the creation of a trilateral parliament in 1983 and the abolition of the Go away Laws in 1986, the 1980s observed the worst political violence by both sides. "[Boddy-Evans]
My Children! My Africa! is a play which depicts a period when companionship and cooperation over the colour collection were extremely exceptional. Such human relationships were purely frowned upon and positively discouraged by apartheid officialdom. This is because they represented a potential risk to the elaborately made and legislated racial obstacles.
In My Children! My Africa! (an emphatic title indeed) Fugard produced an extremely powerful remarkable work which explores the probability of such interracial associations despite the human being and professional risks engaged. His thrust is that mere skin shade should by no means be a significant hurdle to friendship and assistance.
The play entails a white schoolgirl and black schoolboy whose professor must take dangers in sending the black youngster to a mixed-race team in a literary competition. They have different viewpoints in how to issue the system. The schoolboy, Thami, has followed an frame of mind of violent confrontation, whereas the instructor is more in favour of a conciliatory and steady approach to change, hoping optimistically that violence can be averted. The schoolgirl, Isabel is besieged with white liberal guilt.
The play shows varying attitudes to the best approach to achieving inevitable change. As it turned out it was the destabilising threat of violent confrontation that in the end counted in effecting change in South Africa. The play is at fact written in 1985 foreshadowing the unbanning of the ANC and the subsequent release of Nelson Mandela some 5 years later.
Fugard was an active supporter of the Anti apartheid activities and endorsed international boycotts of segregated audience theater in South Africa. Actually he was vilified, harassed and put under security police force surveillance. In order to avoid further trouble with the regulators Fugard had his works produced and released outside of the country [Alan McIver :2010]
Fugard was accorded huge international identification. His powerful and impressive body of work surely added in a significant way to international awareness of the dire expanding situation in South Africa. To me he is an inspiring number, whose natural depictions of the damaging human consequences of an evil system exposed audience's sight to cruel and unsustainable realities.
Fugard once said: "[My] real place as a dramatist is the world of secrets using their powerful influence on human behavior and the injury with their revelation. Whether it is the radiant secret in Pass up Helen's heart or the withering one in Boesman's or the dark and detrimental one in Gladys, they are the dynamos that make all the significant action in my own plays"[Fugard]. We are able to gather out of this, that his has are always individually and contextually significant and he intends to display and discover and bring to light deeper issues within them. Using the two plays mentioned above as proof, one can not only tell that Fugard really cares about his work and his country but also that his work can be an accurate representation of the times and society where he was writing.
[Words: 1655]
