The poem Ars Poetica from the commence to the finish shows the reader how to learn a poem. It has a few misunderstand able parts however, many items are also very self-explanatory. MacLeish uses imagery showing what how the poetry should be read. He used fruits, the moon and even wish to show the reader what his take on how people should read poetry should be. The poem can be split into 3 stanzas: the first is about how exactly simple a poem can be, the second is about how exactly the reader should feel as he reads the poem and the third is about how exactly a reader should respond to the poem with participating in on the feeling. One thought this poem was a challenging to understand because of the vague parts but I really believe the author is wanting to instruct the reader about how to learn a poem properly. This poem has many different interpretations which is up to the reader on how they see it.
The first stanza summarizes the complete poem. The writer exemplifies how simple and silent a poem should be. The majority of his ideas are weighed against illustrations and similes. "Ars Poetica" from the first lines it identifies a fruit. Within the lines "Dumb / As old medallions to the thumb / Silent as the sleeve-won stone / Of casement ledges where in fact the moss has grown" (series 3-6), he means that poems are dumb and should be silent. From just these few lines we can see he is very logical and simple minded along with his thoughts. He bluntly says what he would like the reader to get out this poem therefore he offers no indication on symbolism or concealed meanings. "A poem should be wordless / as the journey of birds" (brand 7-8) means since the activities of birds are extremely sight only, that it takes no thinking to observe their flights in any way. Through that brand he provides non-complicity of the poem. Macleish is saying that alternatively than having people just listen to it; they need to relate with the context and be able to react with the storyplot.
The second stanza is almost equivalent in the move and group as the first. Through lines 9-16 the writer says it seems like the moon just goes up and falls without is being alert to it. We research at the night time sky and it is just there. Using the lines "Leaving, as the moon produces / Twig by twig the night-entangled tress, " an (11-12) show at the moon is noticeable sometimes and other times it can be hidden. "Leaving, as the moon behind the wintertime leaves, / Ram by memory your brain" (13-14), he uses these imagery to inform the reader that it is okay not to understand the poem completely, it is properly acceptable to understand only a few elements of a poem because each individual perceives a poem very differently. He emphasizes the fact that a poem is merely a memory and that it will soon fade away. In the last line of the second stanza, "A poem should be motionless in time / As the moon climbs" (15-16), he uses this imagery showing that poetry should be taken in a comfortable and slow pace that is certainly should not cause an instantaneous reaction in your brain. He repeated this series to mention a certain image. This demonstrates the desires the reader to comprehend that certain image of "motionless in time".
The third stanza; "A poem should be equal to: / Not true", is the line in the poem where some may be not certain what the writer is trying to state. He could mean that the reader should interrupt the poem in his own way and that the poem should be add up to nothing at all. The image "For all your background of grief"(19) shows the hardship that many folks face inside our daily lives, but by the end all there is showing is "A clear doorway and a maple leaf" (20). "For love / leaning grasses and two lighting above the ocean" (21-22) shows an enchanting aspect to the poem. The final line claims "A shouldn't mean / but be. " (23-24) shows that a poem should cause a effect with the reader; it ought to be just read and left it at that. It says the poem should reach the idea quick but also be significant.
From the article, "Palpable and mute". A reading of Archibald MacLeish's "Ars Poetica" by Muhhammad Hesham; he interpreted the storyline almost like I did so. He said, "The reader, therefore, is alerted from the very start that what at hand is not a little bit of poetry, but rather a piece on poetry" this demonstrates he is seeking to say that it is not a poem but instead a poem how to create a poem. He would go to say in the first stanza that the writer depends on imagery to help connect to the reader. From the second stanza, "The image of the moon climbing unobtrusively behind the trees and moving imperceptibly in your brain evokes the ideas of stillness and eternity" talks about how the image of the moon was used to engrave a variety of ideas. With the ultimate stanza Muhhammad talks about how precisely the previous stanza is approximately love and grief and how this poem has "its kind of truth" meaning that a person as his own perspective on a poem or his own kind of fact about the poem. "The reader's labour, on the other palm, is to have a problem with the silence of the poem to make it answer and imply. It is silence, therefore, that endows a poem using its being, its essence, and its potential to generate unending interpretations" I think that he was hoping to say that it's up to the reader to comprehend what the poet was hoping put together in his poem, no person can help you understand because each poem has unending interpretations.
With the final outcome, I say that from reading "Ars Poetica" and the article, it shows the reader that poetry is not only to be read but instead to be known at an individual level. Each reader has their own thoughts, feelings and reactions to a poem and Archibald MacLeish was only aiming to point the reader in the right route using amazing imagery. From this article it was backed up by Muhhammad from what he took of this article. He saw it not as a bit of poetry but instead a piece on poetry. He says that every poem has unending interpretations and that the reader must struggle to find theirs.
