The paper aims to describe, compare research ways of differing natures i. e. quantitative, qualitative and blended, in respect with this issue 'dysfunctional family members'. The paper will give a short introduction of the research topic itself, and can then progress to spell it out at length the advantages, weaknesses and suitability of every of the research methods mentioned previously. These procedures, and their data collection and research methods will be likened and contrasted, so that the most practical method can be discovered. In conclusion, a summation will presented of the reason why for the mode of research identified as the utmost suitable and applicable one, in studying dysfunctional households.
A dysfunctional family system is available when problems in one or even more of the hierarchical, boundary or alignment elements of its composition have impaired its resources for coping with and adapting effectively to contextual stressors (Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 2004). This generally centers on individuals who are neglecting or lacking in their shows and obligations of a family, allowing misuse and don't run common, so that a child and other people may feel deprived or/and guilty. Tis may lead to a result of overtly aggressive patterns. In such instances and situations, 'a family system can no longer deal efficiently with every day stressors or adequately nurture the growth of its specific participants (Colapinto, 1995), especially of children dependent on parents/parents for support and direction.
The dysfunctional family is an important theme of study in neuro-scientific sociology, and so research completed on this issue must be severe, so that findings can be generalized and studies across demographically and geographically defined boundaries. For this purpose, an analysis of differing research methodologies, in respect with this issue is presented, so that the most suitable way for understanding the dynamics of your dysfunctional family may be recognized. However, before details of each method are provided, it must be considered that 'there are certain ideas: the aims of the study, and this research questions devised to meet those aims, determine the methods of investigation, data collection and analysis. Picking preferred methods, and then installing the study questions around these, is unquestionably not good practice. The nature of the research question(s) to be pursued may require a sensible blend of methods across the continuum of qualitative and quantitative research techniques' (Butt, G. 2010)
The first method of research to be complete is that of qualitative research. This refers to research strategies that aim to understand and collect data on factors involved in their natural configurations, and aim to interpret the relationships they have with the environment. This is research methods and data that may be whatever is not clustered into statistical and numerical form. In case of understanding and attaining conclusions about the dysfunctional family trend, qualitative research includes methods of observation, circumstance studies and interviews (ranging from open concluded to targeted, but being exploratory in aspect), focus groupings, audio and video tape evaluation; which aim to give the researcher complete information, rich in context and explanation(s). Through the process of collecting qualitative research, data collection will largely and commonly be achieved through principal methods mentioned earlier (case study, interviews and observation) or less generally, through supplementary methods, such as an assessment of literature and files of recently available data on this issue. Both methods, however, try to uncover the real human side of the data and make an effort to include and interpret from participant's experience and emotions.
This allows us to infer that the analytical tools for understanding qualitative data are largely interpretative in nature, from inductive reasoning and functions. This also contributes to the structuring of definitions and meanings, essential to the study topic in question. More specifically, analytical strategies used to interpret are many, and beyond the range of the paper. A couple of are being stated for reader-benefit however. The first analytical strategy employed by qualitative experts is that of 'constant comparative examination', which 'includes taking one piece of data (one interview, one statement, one theme) and looking at it with others that may be similar or different in order to build up conceptualizations of the possible relations between various bits of data. (Thorne, S, 2000). For example, by looking at the accounts of two different people who had a similar nurturing experience in dysfunctional families, possibly two siblings, a researcher might cause analytical questions like: why is this different from that? And exactly how are these two related?' This approach is often directed towards finding commonalities and habits within the human being experience of dysfunctional young families. Another common procedure for studying qualitative data is through phenomenological approaches, which seek to uncover the underlying composition and fact of dysfunctional family activities, through rigorous and in-depth review of individual situations. For example, alternatively than detailing the stages and transitions that an individual undergoes in a dysfunctional family, a phenomenological analysis will possibly attempt to find about and clarify the essential mother nature of the changeover, presenting it so that a person who hasn't experienced the occurrence is able to appreciate the clearness and vividness of the explanation.
The qualitative research method offers sizeable strengths with a good share of sketch backs for the researcher. The power includes the fact that the study presents an in-depth, abundant and vivid justification of a possibly complicated and complex phenomenon. That is specifically helpful in growing theories and presenting conceptual bases, as well as proposing hypothesis to clarify a sensation regarding dysfunctional households.
However, because qualitative data are intensive and time consuming to carry out, they are really narrowed down geographically, which means sample being studied cannot be used as a true rep and the findings of the research can therefore, not be generalized. For instance, a researcher studying dysfunctional family and its related issues in THE UNITED STATES cannot generalize the studies and hold the same results true for a dysfunctional family in Japan, because of the changed changing situational parameters and context. In addition, small differences that could be important in regard with dysfunctional family members are often over looked by researcher while undertaking qualitative research. Also, because of the subjective mother nature of the study along with high likelihood of researcher-bias, the results of qualitative research absence consistency and validity in most cases.
Another mean of collecting data and transporting our research is through quantitative measures, which seek to gather data and rely on strict numerical and statistical examination, following means of natural sciences to keep up objectivity. Common ways to handle quantitative research is through studies and questionnaires of pre-designed questions. These questions are asked in a consistent fashion to gather data of people. Characteristics of the participant test for the study goal are carefully set up so that they match those of the bigger population being studied. For example, a researcher learning attributes of children in dysfunctional households may gather in his participants a share of children, which in their number and gender symbolize the larger percentage of children in dysfunctional people. These children will then be asked questions that are pre-designed and goal in aspect, in a regular and similar fashion to get rid of any kind of bias.
Data generated this way is generally inferred through deductive means i. e. the researcher begins with a hypothesis and provides out quantitative research methods to verify and disconfirm the initial hypothesis. Organic and long statistical models are being used to analyze the data and reach conclusions. Results and finings are numerically guarded and explained. Statistical examination for quantitative data can range from correlations to regularity models and beyond, all utilizing simple or complex statistical models and techniques.
Strengths for quantitative steps to carry out research are the fact that the study problem is specifically mentioned, in set terms as well as the dependent and unbiased variables being obviously and precisely specified. Statistical inference allows the study to follow strictly the place research goals and so reach more objective conclusions, as well as allowing the researcher to test the hypothesis and determine issues of causality. In enhancements, because data is simple in mother nature and is not hard to investigate and summarize comparisons across various civilizations and societies regarding dysfunctional people can be drawn upon. The study methods are specifically specific through their reduction and minimization of 'subjectivity of common sense' (Kealey & Protheroe, 1996).
However, at exactly the same time, quantitative research does not supply the researcher with details and framework of the situation. For example, the type of dysfunction in individuals may vary and can have come about owning to different parameters and situational factors: quantitative research and subsequent data collection will fail to observe these elements. Also, because the studies are carried out within an environment that is not natural to the members, behavioral distinctions might be viewed. Which means that the respondents may reply untruthfully and dishonestly, to make an impression the interviewer or come in a good light. The sealed end framework of the questionnaires and study questions are also a down side as they lead to limited effects, of those that are discussed in the original research question(s) only. Continuous investigation of an occurrence is not encourages and depth of the situational context neglected.
Given the mass surveys and handled observations, that generally symbolize the entire society, quantitative research methods carry trustworthiness and validity in their findings and results. Also, because quantitative research methods generally aim to answer the 'why' question regarding dysfunctional families, these results and data results can be generalized to bigger population communities, often across nationally and culturally separated boundaries. For instance, in explaining known reasons for aggression in children owned by dysfunctional families, experts may generalize the results across two or more culturally similar teams and communities.
The third and the final method of obtaining data regarding issues of dysfunctional households are 'put together methods' i. e. a study technique whereby methods from different paradigms (qualitative and quantitative) are brought together, to gather and review data. 'in standard, mixed methods research presents research which involves collecting, inspecting, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data in one study or in a series of studies that check out the same underlying happening' (Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2009). For example, a researcher may conduct some semi-structured interviews with a little number of children and also perform a large-scale survey to understand the impact of the 'dysfunctional variable' in young families on child-aggression. This integration of qualitative measures with quantitative research methods are generally known as multi-strategy research.
Data collection and evaluation processes for the techniques used are similar in characteristics to those described previously. It ought to be remembered that "methodological congruence" (Watts & Bentley, 1986) should always be there in the study being carried out - that is, a reliability and compatibility between the methods used to collect research data and the ones used to analyze it. The blended method strategy of data collection is particularly useful in learning topics like that of dysfunctional individuals, because they leave space for and invite triangulation to take place. This means that one information source is often supplemented by the other, so the research subject matter can be contacted and realized using multiple viewpoints. In addition, by assuring that a research subject regarding dysfunctional people is researched through varying viewpoints, a researcher minimizes bias and subjectivity, thus making certain the results of the research and results come to are objective and translucent in their characteristics.
However, because the info collection method is still in its infancy periods, functional applicability of the methods is particularly perplexing. Also, the researcher is faced with the challenge of choosing the perfect research-method designs, offset of which may be devastating to research objectives.
The research email address details are reliable and valid in their status because the usage of different approaches helps the researcher maintain concentrate on the pertinent research question and thus confirms its correctness. Information and results are complemented form one type of research to some other, thus not a sole point of available data is neglected. Therefore, research conclusions this way can be generalized across different civilizations and societies.
Having studies at length the three ways of data collection and research on dysfunctional young families, assessing and contrasting their advantages and weaknesses, I assume that the mot appropriate and appropriate way of studying dysfunctional family members will be by using blended methods, as they will be extensive and appropriate in their findings, as well as generalize-able. They will allow a researcher to carry a compounded research, including all aspects of the topic, rather than neglecting a single point of importance. Instead of focusing solely on any one method, they'll allow the researcher to focus on the research question t large, covering all items of consideration and therefore allowing the researcher to present a complete summary of the topic in question.
