The Irish rebellion had not been the only factor in causing the English civil war. There were many other permanent and short term factors which may have contributed to the civil battle. These long-term causes were vitality, religion and money. The short-term causes were Charles' decision to introduce the prayer booklet and bishops into scotish kirks, the first bishops conflict, the second bishops war and the Irish rebellion. Which caused pressure between ruler and parliament.
Power is one of the primary known reasons for the civil warfare as Ruler Charles I used to be at loggerheads with parliament who also want just as much ability as the king had had over the past years. Parliament were upset that the Ruler had had all the capacity to himself for the past 11 years during his personal rule and they desired some of that power for themselves. Charles tried to use the power he had to change the way the church in Scotland was run, as it says he can in the divine protection under the law of kings which was a critical way to obtain conflict throughout King Charles I reign.
As king and mind of the Cathedral of England, Charles had the power to change the way the church was run. Charles decided to reform to cathedral with the aid of the Arch bishop of Canterbury, William Laud. This angered parliament, the majority of whom were puritans. They couldn't agree to the Laudian reforms and this became a major source of discord though out Charles's reign and was a major contributing factor to the start of the civil war.
Religion had been a major way to obtain tension for many years in Great britain as the Protestants and Catholics had been at loggerheads since Queen Mary I needed killed a large number of Protestants. Since that time, Protestants and Catholics experienced seen one another as a danger, that was already causing pressure in England which, again, could have been a significant contributor to the start of the civil warfare.
Money possessed also become a huge area of concern for Parliament who believed they had to discover a way to stop Charles from funding is 11 calendar year personal guideline. Parliament offered Charles Tunnage and Poundage for only one year which could have greatly angered him as monarchs normally get tonnage and poundage indefinatly. Charles imposed the Distraint of Knighthood which angered many landowners as men using estates worthy of 40 per 12 months were meant to present themselves at a fresh Kings coronation for Knighting. This might mean that that they had to pay extra taxes after they became a Lord or a Sir and Charles fined those who didn't present themselves for Knighting even though this legislations was not enforced because the early Tudors. This intended that Charles's things would have began revolting and therefore caused extreme anger within the country and could have helped to cause the civil warfare.
Along with the three permanent causes there have been a whole lot of short-term causes. These included the changes that King Charles tried to bring in to the Scottish Kirks, the first bishops conflict, the second bishops warfare, the actions considered by parliament to undermine King Charles and the Irish Rebellion.
Charles tried out to generate Bishops in to the Scottish Kirks. Charles needed more control over what took place in the churches, so brought in Bishops to regulate what happened. However, this made the Scottish feel betrayed as they noticed that Bishops were too catholic for his or her protestant views. Charles also made a decision he wished to bring in the prayer book used in British churches as he thought that the Scottish kirks were disorganised and lacked reverence. The Scottish felt their kirk was a symbol of their spiritual and cultural id and by Charles hoping to change the way the kirks were run they sensed that their personal information was being recinded from them, which made them want to fight to stop the Ruler making any longer changes. This is a crucial factor in leading to the civil warfare and may have been more significant than the Irish rebellion as the folks of Scotland united with parliament and well prepared for a battle against Charles.
After 11 many years of personal guideline, Charles message or calls parliament, however, he doesn't like what they say and quickly closes parliament again after just three weeks. This might have angered the participants of parliament and made them more likely to revolt and antagonise Charles and eventually start a civil war.
At the beginning of the first bishops was in 1639, Ruler Charles began nurturing an army. Charles possessed asked parliament for money to increase the strength of the army but parliament, fearing that if the ruler had an military, he'd use that army against them, which could have caused more anxiety between king and parliament. King Charles was designed to signal the treaty of Berwick which required him to forego his ideas to create the British prayer publication in Scotland. This might have angered him as he thought that he previously the right to change anything to do with the cathedral as brain of the Church of England. Also the divine right of kings said that he could change anything he wanted to and Charles highly assumed this which could have antagonised parliament and the Scottish along with Charles being irritated that he had not been being permitted to do what he thought he should have been. This would have played a larger role in creating the civil battle than the Irish rebellion.
During the second bishops battle, the Scottish invaded and occupied Newcastle and purchased Charles to pay 850 per day forcing Charles to call parliament in November 1640. This might have angered Charles as he was being guaranteed into a part by parliament and the Scottish and being designed to do something he didn't want to and as king, he can do whatever he wished to as it said in the divine protection under the law of kings.
Along challenging rebellion taking place in Scotland and trouble with parliament not allowing Charles to get any money, in addition, they made it impossible for Charles to rule minus the support of parliament. They impeached Laud (archbishop of Canterbury), created two acts, they removed the prerogative courts and proposed the take action of attainder, one interpretation you can not be imprisoned or punished without trial, the other and therefore you were able to be executed without trial, parliament removed ministers and suggested a Main and Branch petition meaning there would no more be bishops in protestant churches. They also removed money increasing schemes. Many of these measures were made to back Charles into a part and push him to call parliament as he would no longer have the ability to finance a personal rule. All this would have made Charles upset as a few of the policies proposed by parliament were hypocritical and pressured Charles to do what parliament wanted. Parliament experienced stripped Charles of the majority of his electric power, which, as Ruler, Charles experienced was rightfully his.
The Irish rebellion of 1641 may not have been the sole reason behind the civil warfare but it does play a major part. In Oct 1641 the rebellion broke out in Ulster which could have made the folks who resided their extremely troubled and it is likely that they might have fought back as a means of safeguarding their land. Within the November of 1641, many protestant settlers were massacred by Irish insurgents. This might have made the Ruler extremely restless as he too was a protestant and may possibly have been scared in what was to follow. In late November, early December, the Irish rebellion descended into anarchy as repressed hatred between old Irish Catholics and the new protestant settlers resulted in extreme violence.
Although to start out with, almost all of the fighting in Ireland had been between small bands, which were brought up locally and have been attacking the civilians of opposing spiritual and ethnic teams, towards the end of December 1641, Sir Simon Harcourt found its way to Dublin as the top of a sizable army which had been elevated by parliament from voluntary subscriptions. This would have angered and perhaps frightened the Irish residents and may have made the problem worse.
At the hight of the assault in Ireland, it's estimated that up to 12, 000 protestants perished, with the majority dying from cool, and disease after being expelled from their homes in the depths of winter. Because of the violence going on in Ireland and the propaganda posters which were being produced, many Irish catholics and priests were imprisoned anticipated to protestant paranoia. Many Irish troops who were returning from preventing for Kings of France and Spain were detained at plug-ins and questioned. This might have induced the Irish to obtain additional furious and aloud the assault to escalate. This might have added to the existing tension in England between ruler and parliament and their differing ideas on religion, money and electricity.
Many catholic rebels had claimed devotion to the King and Charles had proposed that he lead an army to supress the rebellion. However, parliament feared that Charles, if given an army, would use that military to supress the rebellion in England. The puritan attorney at law, John Pym, suggested that parliament should only co-operate in supressing the Irish rebellion if the Ruler appointed advisors which had been approved by parliament, which would mean that they were less inclined to suggest that Charles should start a warfare with parliament. However Charles felt managed by this further harm on his prerogative and lashed out into the beginnings of the civil warfare.
As you can view from the details presented, there have been many reasons and triggers for the beginnings of the civil warfare. Parliament had used a solid dislike to Charles and pretty much from the word go have been guaranteed into a place by Parliament and the civil war was Charles lashing out at Parliament for being so demanding with him. The Irish rebellion was the straw that broke the camels back again, so to speak. In the words of the Kings supporter Earl Clarendon;
"Though Scotland blew the first trumpet, it was Ireland that drew the first blood; and if they had not at that time rebelled, and in that manner, it is very probable all the miseries which after befell the Ruler and his dominions had been prevented. "
http://www. open2. net/civilwar/rootsirish. html
