There is a regular juxtaposition and alternative of love and hate in the book. Love and hate though they seem to be to be polar opposites stem from similar experiences and both of these towards a feeling of confirmation of God's lifestyle. In his hate for Sarah Maurice cannot help but say that is because he adores her. In her love for Maurice Sarah was brought toward God in trust that she'd be able to save him. On the other hand Bendrix's love for Sarah triggers him to help expand reject God despite his summary that God is real. In fulfilment Sarah's wish for Maurice to live on fuelling her notion and trust, Bendrix's antipathy for a God He now acknowledges with hatred because her new found Beliefs takes her away from him.
In their relationship both found God but with different ends. In Bendrix though he concludes that there surely is a God this notion stems from hurting making the God in his mind a God who's wii, a God who is a devil. Within the last portion of the novel Bendrix refers to God and the jump of beliefs; "You're a devil, God, luring us to step. " This animosity of the leap seems to stem from dread more than simply bitterness and hatred. In clinging onto this hatred it seems that he is clinging onto Sarah's physical being, "You could touch locks with your lip area and fingers and I was fatigued to fatality of your brain. I had resided on her behalf body and I wanted her body. " Bendrix as a identity is grounded by the profane as identified by Otto. He constantly seeks proof which is what makes him won't take a step of faith. Clinging onto something he can hold onto and yet have it recinded is the embodiment of suffering. Even his hatred relates to something material and profane, "Hatred is within the mind, not in my own abdomen or skin". This clinging and dread leaves little room for trust in the way Marcel explains it.
Sarah on the other palm experience love in way which it starts her up to hope. To the likelihood of more, the probability of a higher power. The weird thing relating to this opening up to God is the fact it becomes as an exchange. Giving up her affair with Maurice on her behalf new found romance with God. The possibility of Sarah's romantic relationship with God would have been unfounded though without her carnal love. Her trade in a way is a pursuit to save Maurice with the problem that she must not see him again so that he may have the opportunity of happiness. To trust in something other than herself, this opinion comes obviously in her caring Maurice. "I've fallen into opinion like I fell in love. I've never loved before as I really like you, and I've never believed in anything before as I really believe now. "
In Maurice we see love and hate as similar; in his jealousy, in his obsession. While in Sarah there may be that step of faith which is accompanied by peacefulness and a translation of her love for Bendrix as a love for God. The irony and truth behind these two opposing realizations of love within the book is why is it natural. Even the sense of something mystical within connections, even the occurrence of actual wonders as viewed in the book. Relationships hold this transformative quality and because of this emotions are never solely described under one framework.
Within these two sets of notion, that of a believer and a person who hesitatingly concludes there is a God and looks upon Him with hatred making him feel helpless. This hatred however resonates with a sense of fear because he is afraid to have a leap without certainty of the profane. On this passage he mentions that "one cannot love and do nothing at all. " It really is in physicality that Maurice's love for Sarah blossoms and without the physicality from it he is left without certainty. He is still left with something he concerns. In the novel love sometimes appears as both a profane and sacred but not necessarily at the same time.
This brings forth the question of the possibility of love without hate. Want be love if it were not contrary or even combined with hate? Expectation without despair? It appears that one decides to hope because bot everyone seems able to do it. What makes it more interesting is that these two perspectives come from a singular romantic relationship. In Sarah's circumstance there is a sense of Marcel's "I really believe in Thee for all of us". In adoring Maurice she found expectation from this love. Maurice on the other hands finds the contrary to be true, he's robbed of Sarah as a reality and so there is no hope. Yet, in the finish this sense is something Maurice chooses to believe to keep her with him. This sense
It would be easy to simply say that hatred closes us faraway from God but in the novel what love is constantly interchanged with hate. In Maurice's wish that Sarah would be his he's left disappointed as a result of physicality of his objectives and the problem that to be is she must leave Henry. As Marcel highlights this type of trust is not truly wish. In the long run however in his despair of burning off Sarah to fatality Bendrix begrudgingly believes in God for the sake of not burning off Sarah totally. Just as love is interchangeable with hate little or nothing and both need one another to are present. Sarah's hope for Maurice would depend on the despair she experience in giving him, in acknowledging that she is not the best for him.
In the numerous ins and out of the relationship love is employed as a means to see God whether willingly or begrudgingly in the other. In a way these realizations are learned instead of overtly shown. In a way Hick's theodicy is shown here by way of a medium most familiar to us, real human relationships. Within the novel God would be absent for either Maurice or Sarah if indeed they did not have one another. In other folks we find reason to despair and also to desire. Love and in the end God is available through hate and love, loss and suffering, despair and expectation.
