Force Field Evaluation
One of the essential tools for organizational transformation is the utilization of the Power Field Analysis. Matching to Wilson (2000, p. 207), most situations that contain something regarding work can be envisioned as having two collections of forces - the ones that encourage the situation and the ones that prevent or discourage it. Driving a car causes are those causes or factors impacting a situation that happen to be pushing in a particular direction (Jenkins). Traveling forces tend to initiate a change and keep it going. Restraining causes may be likened to wall surfaces or barriers (Jenkins). They only put an end and prevent motions towards advancements. These causes are behaving to restrain or reduce the driving forces.
In any group or organization, there are both driving and restraining pushes at times of change. The Push Field Analysis advises ways of interacting with these opposing makes. With reference to this model, examine the essential phases in the change process, the characteristics of crises and issue, and the managerial approaches for efficiently putting into action change.
Introduction:
Many years ago, Kurt Lewin informed us that the ultimate way to understand an organisation is to attempt to change it out (Carter, et al, 2001 p. 4).
Different organisations have a number of barriers and problems to overcome. These will come both from other external and interior environments. These barriers constitute a pressure for change.
Change is definitely one of the primary top features of organisational life. It might not always be welcomed and desirable but it is demonstrating to be the main one of the key constant in today's changing environment. An company that does not recognize change is an organisation that has ceased to can be found in the real world.
Organisations react to different challenges in several ways. Most of these challenges are brought about by the introduction of new technologies, new rivals, new markets, and new customer requirements (Harvard). These troubles bring about the necessity to adopt organisational change in structure, culture, and process.
If organisations are contemplating changes, then it will be helpful to determine what forces are operating for or against these changes. As these organisations are moving about and utilizing change, they are simply constantly being bombarded with environmental, cultural, economic, politics, and leadership challenges and pressures. These issues breed different kinds of forces. Carefully analyzing the forces that cause these difficulties can help organisations make a decision, control, and put into practice well balanced change programs in difficult and uncertain times.
A model of change calls for identifying the various ways of dealing with these forces by understanding and following a change process, the identification and image resolution of problems and issues, and different managerial approaches to successfully implementing change.
Force Field Analysis
One of the vital tools for organizational change is the utilization of the Force Field Analysis. Relating to Wilson (2000, p. 207), most situations that contain something regarding work can be envisioned as having two pieces of pushes - the ones that encourage the problem and those that prevent or discourage it. Traveling makes are those makes or factors impacting a situation that are pushing in a specific direction (Jenkins). Generating forces have a tendency to initiate a big change and keep it heading. Restraining makes may be likened to surfaces or barriers (Jenkins). They only put an end and prevent moves towards advancements. These causes are performing to restrain or reduce the driving makes.
When driving causes are countered by restraining makes, a certain degree of equilibrium develops. This equilibrium can be lifted or reduced by changes in the partnership between the traveling power and the restraining push.
Sometimes, in order to keep this equilibrium, driving pushes may be increased or reduced. Throughout doing so however, additional restraining forces may emerge. Different causes can be changed by reducing or removing pushes, stretching or adding pushes, and changing the path of causes.
Force field evaluation is a management strategy developed by Kurt Lewin, a pioneer in the field of interpersonal sciences for diagnosing situations (Accel-team). It is often useful when looking at the variables involved in planning and implementing a big change program and in seeking to overcome resistance to improve and inertia. It is also widely used to see decision-making and planning and implementing change management programs in several organizations. As the vital tool in organisational change, it can identify the comparative goal of factors on each aspect of organizational issues. It may also be used to analyse the makes impacting these issues and situations.
Force Field Research Process
This examination is carried out with an organization using a flip chart or over head transparency. Usually, the first step is to determine the existing situation and agree on the goal of the insurance policy or institutional change. This goal should be written between two columns. All the makes for change (usually, travelling causes) and stimulating advancements should be outlined using one column and all forces against change (restraining causes) in the other. The next step is to try to create the weight of every push, that is, how much affect has been exerted by that power using a scale of 1 1 to 5 where 1 denotes a weak influences and 5 denotes a solid impact. Equilibrium is usually achieved when the total of the weights of the driving a car causes equals the total of the weights of the restraining causes.
Force Field Evaluation as a Model of Change
Wilson (2000, p. 224) says that for most organisations that are going to embark on change process, one of the first steps is made for senior managers to invest time reviewing strategies and discovering alternatives. This process may involve away days, training seminars, and conferences. Another strategy is to specify specific problems and ask specific questions related to the several problems. This can be a difficult task considering the level of energy needed to break the opposition to change and inertia. For instance, in analyzing how to improve and boost the amount of enrollees in most higher education establishments, questions like, we will change just how we screen and admit students or what exactly are the forces which are keeping our strategies in their present craze? The education sector is in an exceedingly competitive environment nowadays. Colleges and universities around the world are keen on attracting an even greater number of students even from distant places through different online programs.
However, as school administrators are slowly and gradually exploring deeper in to the root causes of falling range of school students, it becomes clearer that there could be some strong pushes preventing large changes in strategies from developing as well as strong makes pressing toward changing the nature of the whole educational system.
There might be several forces which point toward more satisfactory levels of screening process techniques and even means of attracting prospective university students:
- Students desire more adaptable schedules and more convenient ways of working with their instructors.
- College access examinations might not exactly continually be the most reliable way of screening process and evaluating potential college students.
- Technology allows for education related services to simulate traditional class environments and relationships.
In addition to these makes, schools desire to be the guts of brilliance on specific domains of learning. Today, academic institutions are continually attempting to boost on all the areas of their scholar services.
There might be other makes which appear to be against these changes. Some of these forces are:
1. Many faculty participants in most colleges and universities lack formal training in technology-based educational system.
2. Easing on the present method of testing students and experimenting with the unidentified makes everyone involved feel insecure.
3. Testing with new arranging methods may be high-risk and can contribute to the deterioration of class instructions and the quality of other services.
During the clarification stage of the change process, one of the goals of this stage is to be in a position to clarify misconceptions and provide the community and venue where doubts can be raised and addressed properly. Discovering the travelling and restraining pushes are focused on attaining a common understanding of what the proposed changes means and exactly how it pertains to the entire company. One of the driving causes is the necessity to see and imagine the brief and long term benefits of any proposed changes. The restraining force may be the lack of specific and specific information and promoting documentation with regards to the proposed changes.
During the execution phase of the change process, it's important to achieve a certain degree of success. After having clarified some goals, mature management can spend more time developing clear options of success. A number of the driving a vehicle and restraining makes can be focused on how and when to gauge the success of the executed changes.
In each stage of the change process, it is crucial to achieve a certain level of equilibrium so that change can be sustained and be retained going.
Force Field Analysis Example
The power field research has been used in diverse fields ranging from organisational change to self-development.
In another example of using the pressure field examination for change, let us examine the goal of one creation company. This making company would like to use new strategies and new systems in their marketing operations. The travelling and restraining push are sorted on common themes or templates and are prioritized regarding to their magnitude towards change by assigning a credit score or score to each power, which range from 1 to 5 where 1 denotes a poor power and 5 as the strong force.
Driving forces Score/Rating
Customers want new home elevators products 4
Improve quickness of information delivery to customers 3
Raise level of product consciousness 4
Marketing costs are increasing 3
___________
Total 14
Restraining forces Report/Rating
Loss of personnel overtime 2
Staff frightened by new solutions 3
Environmental impact of new technologies 3
High cost of new solutions 3
Disruption to daily marketing businesses 2
___________
Total 13
Based on the prior example, it is clear that the traveling forces are driving for new ways of marketing products and services. One of the new technologies which can be used to advertise these products and services can be the use of web-based technologies and the web. The use of the net provides customers a lot of opportunities to get access to real-time information at a much faster rate in comparison to traditional marketing techniques like the printing and syndication of card catalogs comprising new product information and specs. This strategy also raises the amount of awareness of the products and services as it can cover a wider customer basic. Although initially, trading on new solutions can be cost-prohibitive, in the long run, as marketing costs related to printing and manpower eventually rises, the utilization of web and Internet technology may prove to be a lot more cheaper over time.
One of the restraining makes is the increased loss of staff overtime. It really is one restraining force because these overtimes provide additional pay to employees and it would make it more challenging for these employees to come to conditions with these deficits anticipated to changes in marketing strategies. The use of the web practically lessens the necessity to do overtime marketing careers especially for individuals who are working on the field. Sometimes, the personnel may be averse to the launch of new technologies as there is always the amount of uncertainty and job loss to be brought about by them.
Crisis and Issues
Problem solving is often worried about shifting the balance (Wilson, p. 207). As organisations conform changes, certain romantic relationships are manufactured, certain plans are changed, and some techniques are developed. In handling conflicts and problems brought about by change, the make field evaluation can help identify the different forces that bring about negative and positive feedbacks and reactions from people. Folks are being asked to give up practices, relationships, attitudes, and sometimes thoughts (Wilson, p. 218). In seeking to resolve issues and problems situations associated with organized changes, the pressure field evaluation can reduce or remove the make that is causing the conflict situation. It can also expand or add new pushes to counter another force. In certain cases where conflicts cannot be settled through the addition or removal of certain forces, changing the direction of these makes can be an substitute. If organisations are to place a new school of thought in conflict image resolution, they are adding a new driving make.
Managerial Strategies for Successfully Implementing Change
It is crucial for organisations undergoing change to create effective techniques and strategies for the planning and management of change (Pieters, p. 119). Taking care of change by using the force field evaluation may undoubtedly bring forth new means of determining factors that can contribute to the success or failure of the change process. Management of change operations must consider not only short-term goals but also permanent ones. The make field analysis is seen as the platform in diagnosing interrelationships between your intervening factors in the organisational setup.
Management techniques in organisational change should not upset the equilibrium. Sometime, top level management's desire to attain and see instant results through increased revenue and productivity by increasing the traveling pushes can breed different collections of restraining forces. A director that is autocratic and imposes high working expectations and self-control on the entire organisation can get to achieve an immediate increase in output in the short term. However, new restraining pushes may develop in the form of increased antagonism and hostility on the director and the company in general. It may make discontentment, disillusionment, and increased amount of resistance to improve. By the time a new supervisor gets control, there would already be an elevated activity related to different restraining pushes which can cause lower production and output. This new equilibrium may need a new group of managerial approaches to be able to stabilize the situation. The manager could see the necessity to increase result and productivity straight away but may try another procedure. He might not exactly immediately raise the driving forces but may try to diminish the restraining forces by participating in dialogs and other problem fixing techniques. With the possible elimination of hostility and negative attitudes towards management, in the long term, the equilibrium (increased efficiency) needed to attain a certain level of increased output may get started to be performed through upsurge in skills and commitment to organisational targets.
It is also important to develop the patterns of participative work since chances are possible that the identification of different forces can come from the several degrees of the company (Harvard). Specifically, many of these approaches are the following:
- Push the decision making down to the cheapest possible. The recognition of the root factors behind problems and the possible solutions to these problems can be found on the ones that are in the frontline.
- Begin posting information freely. By showing information freely, people of the company are encouraged to talk about their own problems and experience.
- Make communication a two way avenue. It is important to speak and listen at the same time.
- Eliminate pointless symbols of hierarchy and unequal position. These symbols can come by means of executive lunch break rooms and auto parking places.
- Encourage participatory management. It's important to keep in mind that many people are also capable of managing different aspects of the life.
- Get in to the trenches with frontline employees and encourage other professionals to do the same. This management approach would be construed as a way of bridging the distance between management and the labor force.
- Give people practice in collaborative work between functions by attacking jobs and problems through cross-functional clubs. This approach promotes more connection and communication not only between management and the employees but from on the list of employees themselves.
- Help people start to see the 'why' of change, and work with them to find the what. It is not hard to clarify and understand the necessity for change. What's difficult to understand and see is the why. You can find interlocking problems and complicated issues that have to be simplified for each and every individual to see.
With admiration o cultural change, the next steps and approaches is highly recommended:
- Uncover beliefs and worth.
- Acknowledge, respect, and discuss differences between core beliefs and beliefs of different sub ethnicities within the company.
- Look for incongruencies between mindful and unconscious beliefs and values and handle by choosing those to that your organisation needs to commit.
Conclusion:
It is assumed that in virtually any situation, there are traveling and restraining forces that effect any change that can occur. Organisations that are organizing some form of changes need to be able to choose a particular change model that could address the majority of the issues and issues that would be associated with it.
The pressure field analysis can be considered a good model for change. This analysis provides a great deal of opportunities for organisations contemplating on change to see different situations and identify different models of pushes that can straight affect the change process, discord and crisis quality, and managerial methods to these changes. In addition, it allows the organisation to think about these pushes and adopt concern measures predicated on the strengths of the forces. In general, this means that the organisation has become into grips with the issues that they are currently experiencing and have considered all the consequences of all possible solutions. Generating forces have a tendency to initiate change while restraining pushes tend to decrease or even stop the driving pushes from initiating change. The existing setup of today's organisations and the way they adjust to changing environments affected by a lot of factors and makes makes the power field analysis one of the best models in handling and implementing organisational change. The harsh certainty of life nowadays motivates the removal of restraining forces alternatively than develop overpowering and travelling causes. These strategies provide one of the most powerful analytical tools yet for organisational change.
Bibliography
Duck, Jeanie (2001), The Change Monster, Crown Business, New York.
Harvard Business Basics (2003), Taking care of Change Changeover, Harvard Business
Carter, L et al (2001), Best Practices in Organizational Development and Change,
Wiley, San Francisco.
Kanter, Rosabeth (1992), The Challenge of Organizational Change, Free Press, Canada.
Nutt, Paul (1992), Managing Planned Change, McMillan, Singapore.
Pieters, Gerald (2000), The Ever-Changing Organization: Creating the Capacity for
Continuous Change, Learning, and Improvement, St. Lucie Press, Florida.
Wilson, Graham (2000), Problem Fixing, 2nd edn, Kogan Web page, London.
Jenkins, David (1949), Force Field Analysis Put on a Institution Situation, Retrieved:
May 30, 2005 from http://www. crossroad. to/Quotes/brainwashing/force-field. htm.
Force Field Examination, Retrieved: May 28, 2005 from
http://www. pyswww. com/mtsite/forcefield. html.
Force Field Examination, Retrieved: May 30, 2005 from http://www.
Asem. org/conferences/2004/conferenceproceedings/koplyay150. pdf
Team Building: Power Field Examination, Retrieved: May 28, 2005 from
http://www. accel-team. com/techniques/force_field_analysis. html
Sustainable Change Management, Retrieved: May 29, 2005 from
http://www. challengequest. com/pdf/sustainable_change_management. pdf
Organizational Culture: Change Process, Retrieved: May 30, 2005 from
http://www. soi. , org/readaing/change/process. shtml
