Abstract
Traditional mechanised agitation fermenters have dominated the industry because the antibiotic era as needs evolved new fermenter designs were created. Because of this air lift agitated fermenters were created and have many merits in comparison to mechanical agitation fermenters. In this article we will go through both systems merits when it comes to mixing, aeration, practicality and energy costs
Introduction
Agitators are mechanical instruments used to combine substances, Fermentation can be an age old art in which organic substances are broken down and reassembled into other substances. Fermenters are large bioreactors where fermentation occurs, fermenters will be the instruments utilized to manufacture financially viable biological products. Their basic function is to provide a controlled environment to be able to achieve best growth and product creation of the particular biological product required. For biotech and pharmaceutical purposes the products from fermentation are microbial skin cells or biomass, enzymes, and microbial metabolites such as antibiotics and ethanol. The basic desired useful properties of most Fermenters are that they can create gas water interfaces without making foam an issue. They must sufficiently hold up dispersed phases and allow reasonable heat copy. They should also have the ability to control bulk flow so no dead zones can develop. In category with these practical requirements they must be cheap, robust and also have a simple mechanical design additionally they should have low power usage and be easy to size up. In this essay we will compare two different types of Fermenters, airlift Fermenters and mechanically agitated Fermenters.
Both types of mixers within Fermenters ends in the intermingling of several dissimilar portions of material resulting in the acquirement of either physical or chemical uniformity in the final product. In professional fermentation reactions there is a basic dependence on substrate, organism, normal water and oxygen. Combining within Fermenters usually causes equilibrium between, rate, purity and production yield. Mechanical agitators are being used in traditional Fermenters for mixing they maintain optimum substrate biomass awareness everywhere, keeps sound suspended, disperse oxygen, and allow an upkeep of total bubble surface area and the recycling of air bubbles (physique 1).
Mechanically agitated Fermenters
Mechanically agitated Fermenters require a relatively high source of energy per device size. In these systems a huge variety of impeller shapes and sizes are available to produce different flow patterns inside the Fermenter. The use of multiple impellers produces better mixing that works in addition with baffles that are usually used to lessen vortexing. About 70-80% of the volume of stirred reactors is filled with water. Foaming may be a problem with this kind of Fermenter. Foam breakers, may be necessary. It is better to use mechanical anti foamers over chemical anti foamers because the chemicals often reduce oxygen transfer rate. Among the limits of this system is the use of high acceleration impellers may damage and even damage cells. Aspect ratios of these Fermenters fluctuate over a wide range. For aeration to be increased an increased aspect ratio is necessary (H/D rates). Increased aeration ends in greater contact times between liquid and increasing bubbles and produces hydrostatic pressure in the bottom of the Fermenter.
Bubble column /Air Lift Fermenters
In these systems aeration and mixing up are achieved by gas sparging. Gas is sparged only into the riser. Diminished liquid liquid density and gas build up cause the water in the riser to mover up-wards. Gas disengages near the top of the vessel giving heavier bubble-free liquid to recirculate through the downcomer. This process needs less energy than mechanical stirring. This mixing up, method is employed in the creation of beer and bakers candida. The benefits of this method over mechanised agitation are, insufficient moving parts, low capital costs acceptable mass and heating transfer. Air lifted Fermenters produce heterogeneous and homogenous medium moves. In heterogeneous stream, Bubbles and liquids tend to surge up in the heart of the column while a corresponding down circulation of liquid occurs nearby the wall surfaces. In Homogenous movement, bubbles grow with the same upward velocity with no back-mixing of the gas period. Foaming may also be a problem with these Fermenters. You will discover two varieties of air lift up Fermenters internal loop and external loop Fermenters. Mixing up is way better in external loop Fermenters because the riser and downcomers are further apart in exterior loop vessels which cause the density difference between essential fluids in the downcomer and riser to be increased meaning flow of the liquid vessel is faster scheduled to fewer bubbles being taken to the downcomer. Airlift Fermenter are usually used for the culture of immobilized catalyst and the culture of vegetable and animal cells for their low sheer level.
Mixing
Stirred Fermenters and air lifted Fermenters both offer satisfactory blending and mass transfer. However when a large Fermenter is required (50-500M3) for a minimal viscosity medium air lift vessels may be a much better choice due to their advantages. These being they may be cheap to mount and operate. When level up is necessary large mechanised agitators are impractical as the power necessary to achieve adequate blending becomes very high. Mechanical agitators are being used for high viscosity cultures. Mass copy rates decrease at viscosities greater than 50-100 cP. Mechanical agitation creates much more warmth than sparging of compressed gas. This can turn into a problem when the response temp is high for example when hoping to produce one celled proteins from methanol, removal of frictional stirrer heating can be problematic this is where air-lift agitation is preferred.
Comparison
In brief the conventional, stirred container bioreactor has dominated the industry since its successful application in the antibiotic era & most fermentation functions today use Fermenters of the type as a result of this. However due to improve in the industry in regards to products popular. Such as the expansion of hydrodomas cell and recombinant DNA technologies of genetically customized cells of herb, microbial and mammalian origins imposed new demands that traditional agitators could not provide at an financially viable level. For this reason new book Fermenters where designed and put into use. Air lift Fermenter being one of these. The air lift Fermenter does not have any movable parts or motors the only power requirement originates from the environment compressors offering air through the sparging system. No mechanical agitation occurs, the air bubbles pressured through the sparger cause induced turbulent water mixing and mass copy in which mixing rates and aeration rates are coupled collectively. Their main advantage is low sheer and energy necessity along with aseptic seals not being required around the shaft which makes them highly suitable for producing sole celled protein. On top of that in air lift Fermenters mixing is improved upon by the inclusion of a draught tube to impart a circulation loop which produces an increased air mass coefficient (KLA). THE ENVIRONMENT lift Fermenters are ideal when you can find need for light agitation. Whereas the conventional mechanical agitated Fermenters have a broader range of application nevertheless they have a improperly defined mixing style in comparison to airlift Fermenters. Additionally, they cannot be aerated at a higher enough rate due to impeller flooding. Practicality wise they have a long life, the mechanised agitation configuration is becoming too proven in processes for new methodologies to displace them. It would be too expensive to do.
Aeration
To provide aeration into a vessel means to source or expose the medium to the blood flow of air. Airlifted Fermenters provide a much increased aeration than mechanical agitators as gas is constantly pumped in to the medium and consequently causes fluid circulation. Aeration inside a mechanically agitated Fermenter is handled by the kind of impeller and baffle system. For instance Turbines, propellers and paddles are generally used in low viscosity systems and operate at high rotational swiftness inside the Fermenter. Turbines are normally used for dispersion of gases in liquids. There are many types angled-blade turbines and retreating-blade turbines, the rushton/inclined six blade impeller. Similarly for large vessels with high aspect ratios it is common practice to install more than one impeller of the same shaft. Baffles are of particular importance as they prevent gross vortexing which is damaging to blending/ aeration they are normally installed on the walls of your vessel.
Practicality
Depending on the product being stated in the Fermenter and the viscosity of the medium practicality of mechanical and airlift agitators vary. Mechanical agitators are very practical when it comes to blending highly viscous non Newtonian mediums nevertheless the power for this can be very high and subsequently this escalates the costs. Additionally the practicality of the Fermenter being found in respect to merits is determined by the type of product being produced, the microbiology of particular cell systems in use in conjunction with the morphology and nutritional requirements needed for optimal progress. The geometric construction of the Fermenter play an important role. Effective blending to minimise temp, PH & focus gradient are incredibly important especially with mechanically agitated Fermenters specially when an activity is scaled up. Additionally the viscosity of the medium plays an important role, does indeed the medium behave in a Newton or non Newton manner could it be a good or liquid condition fermentation. The sheering aftereffect of a particular agitation system dictates whether absolute sensitive skin cells can be cultivated.
All of this is considered remember what is best for financial performance. For instance large mechanised agitators have better Useful use than air lift agitators for use with the following cell systems, they are immobilised Bacteria, candida and plant skin cells and are used for the for the creation of products such as ethanol, monoclonal antibodies, development factors and therapeutic products. This is because they can tolerate sheer at a rate best for productivity. Leading to large levels of modest quality products with good earnings costs. Additionally air lift agitators are generally used for the cell systems of bacterias candida and other fungi producing products such as single celled protein E. G. Quorn, enzymes, secondary metabolites and biosurfactants. It is because they are more economically practical anticipated to them having low sheer values meaning they don't damage the cells, they have much lower running costs plus they can produce higher value sheer sensitive GM products. Furthermore when it comes to level up with airlifted Fermenters it could be difficult to alter stirring rates rendering it difficult to cope with important rheological changes and foaming. That's where mechanically agitated Fermenters are favoured. Also air lifted Fermenters are less adaptable than mechanically agitated systems as Aeration is in charge of homogenization.
Energy use and Cost
Mechanical agitators use more energy have moving parts, seals and are more costly to perform than airlift fermenters.
The main advantage of air-lift Fermenters over mechanical agitators is they can be made at much better reactor amounts air-lift Fermenters can be built at volumes of several hundreds cubic meters while mechanical run agitators can be scaled up to a maximum of 800-1500 m3 (Ruitenberg et al 2001) As a consequence of this the investment costs of air-lift Fermenters is significantly lower when compared to mechanically managed agitators of the same capacity. At higher volumes mechanised agitators cause mechanised problems due to large electric power requirements of the impeller. Furthermore, scale-up of air-lift Fermenters is much more self-explanatory than that of mechanical agitated fermenters. Scale-up from a 5 m3 pilot to 1500 m3 and bigger is well described. (Ruitenberg et al 2001) Shape 3 shows the Capital cost contrast of air-lift Fermenters vs. mechanical agitated fermenters. The price for a mechanically agitated fermenter is defined as 1 for a 1500 m3 reservoir. The cost of a 1500 m3 air-lift fermenter is somewhat lower than that of the same mechanically agitated fermenter. However, the investment cost comes after the 0. 6 guideline until 6000 m3 is come to. Above 6000 m3, more than one air lift up fermenter might need to be used.
Another benefit of air-lift fementers over mechanised agitated fermenters would be that the oxygen suggestions efficiency is the same or better at significantly lower shear. On top of that Because no moving parts are present in air-lift Fermenters, the expenses for maintenance will be lower when compared with mechanically agitated fermenters. The blend of high air input efficiencies and zero-maintenance costs brings about lower operational costs.
Shear rates are much lower in air-lift Fermenters than in mechanically agitated fermenters. Low shear rates assist in expansion of biofilms, which can increase the reaction rate. This benefit is thought to be most significant when thermophilic bacteria are used. Because a three-phase settler can be integrated together with an air-lift fermenter, the solids retention time can be segregated from the hydraulic retention time triggering biomass retention, (Ruitenberg et al 2001)
Conclusion
Mechanically agitated Fermenters have been in use since the beginning of the industry however scheduled to changes in demand that comes with time in relation to technology and products needed novel Fermenter ideals were designed and placed into fruition air lift Fermenter is but one. In lots of ways this air lift up agitators have many advantages as was just talked about.
References
- Barker, T. W. and J. T. Worgan (1981). "The use of Air-Lift Fermenters to the Cultivation of Filamentous Fungi. " Western Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13(2): 77-83.
- Chisti, Y. and U. J. Jauregui-Haza (2002). "Oxygen copy and blending in mechanically agitated airlift bioreactors. " Biochemical Anatomist Journal 10(2): 143-153.
- Fontana, R. C. , T. A. Polidoro, et al. (2009). "Comparison of stirred fish tank and airlift bioreactors in the development of polygalacturonases by Aspergillus oryzae. " Bioresource Technology 100(19): 4493-4498.
- Margaritis, A. and J. B. Wallace (1984). "Novel Bioreactor Systems and Their Applications. " Bio-Technology 2(5): 447-453.
- Ruitenberg, R. , C. E. Schultz, et al. (2001). "Bio-oxidation of minerals in air-lift loop bioreactors. " International Journal of Nutrient Processing 62(1-4): 271-278.
- Williams, J. A. (2002). "Keys to bioreactor options. " Chemical Executive Improvement 98(3): 34-41.
