Personal identity starts off at this time of conception, within time personal personal information can transform or not change. The change in personal information differs in many instances by factors behind psychological, physical or environmental changes in the individual life. As life progresses with time people have a tendency to change their views on many issues and individuality is involved with those issues. Way of life also play an important role on someone's present or prior identity by being exposed to different elements encountered within their mind while functioning in these activities. The mind is the main influential part of an person to determine their individuality thru time present or future. The id is very important for the wellness of your person in their everyday activities, at the job, and even with their relaintionships.
When it comes to philosophy Personal Personal information is a very broad and extensive subject matter, many philosopher have their own views on the problem. Alternatively my personal choice for this paper must be a very popular philosopher by the name of John Locke who was simply one of the biggest in European countries in the late 1600's and early on 1700's until his fatality. John Locker was created into the level in Europe which was called the Enlightenment in which he helped find the identity of Thomas Jefferson to the idea of the Declaration Of Independence by proclaiming this "men are "endowed with certain inalienable privileges, and this among they are life, liberty and the quest for joy. " With these words explained by Thomas Jefferson, John Locke started out his successful buzz of Idea and the issue of Personal Individuality.
As Locke points out his version of Personal Identity he talks about it in an increased power and often relies on trust, instead of science, to aid him in his major life decisions by using his
personal identification. John Locke's views on personal identification are set out in the selection, "Of Individuality and Variety", taken from his Essay Concerning Individual Understanding. In this essay he talks about humans have the ability to understand through the use of his theories and ideas. John Locke possessed his heart of personal personality in Section 9 of his essay in which he claims his idea of a person is that of a thinking, intelligent (rational) being with awareness of itself (self-consciousness). The idea of a thinking sensible being amounts to the. While John Locke got his opinion and theories on personal personality other philosophers do too. In research Identity is very complex and it does not have any set meaning everyone agrees on. Sarup (1996) talks about identity by using the example of a passport. This might include a photograph of the person and also other details including nationality, a person's name and date-of-birth. While a passport is a form of identity it does not share who you are as a person. It "show's you who you are to enable you to be known in a bureaucratic sense" (Sarup, 1996). Sarup the writer state governments " that identification is to do with who one thinks is, what one is convinced and what one does". While Kidd another author feels that "identity" pertains to how we think about ourselves as people, how exactly we think about other folks around us and what we should think others think of us. Quite simply, the capability to "find out" (Kidd, 2002)who we could as a person. Kidd the other writer states that we are shaped by our culture, and we condition it and perpetuate in it inside our day-to-day lives. Although culture and personal information are often linked they are really, in reality, different in lots of ways than one. "With culture representing the 'macro' routine- the larger picture- and 'personality' representing small more 'micro' meanings we've as individuals" ( Kidd, 2002, p. 7).
In my own identity I've experienced many facets in my 25 years of living in this earth. My own individuality has been developing for each minute of the day, as well as days on and in years. In my readings and research I personally coincide with authors who declare that personal personality is divided by two subsets. These two subsets are seen as a experience and learning. On the contrary to Lockes belief's I feel these two subsets characterize my personal identity's growth. Corresponding to Wenger, individuality is seen as a negotiated experience, which is developed through engagement in practice in which gives us "certain experience of contribution and what our neighborhoods pay attention to makes us as individuals" (Wenger, 1998). "Identity used is defined socially not merely because it is presumed in a cultural discourse of the do it yourself and of communal categories, but also since it is produced as a lived experience of participation in the precise areas" (Wenger, 1998, p. 151).
Learning is an extremely vital item people should come across because it benefits us over time as it pertains to our daily lives and personal encounters and relaintionships. The countless things ive learned thru out my years has attempt to my edge and my personal identity. While working for different companies and organizations my own personal information has differed in each setting up because I had formed a different role in each one. Having different tasks in each of my jobs, my personal personality had to change in time in order for my tenure their to be successful and keep up with all of those other laborers. Based on the writer Wenger "A sense of your learning trajectory offers us means of sorting out what matters and what does not, what plays a part in personal information and what remains marginal" (Wenger, 1998, p. 155).
When we talk about one's personal personality we speak as why is us the person that people are. Our personal information consists of why is us unique and different as a person and from others. Corresponding to Locke personal identification does not involve the body whatsoever, the person could be involved by his soul. If such would happen Locke suggested that the person could be transferred by his own heart and soul. However personal individuality to Locke cannot be equated with the personality of any thinking compound either because the individuality doesn't follow the individuality of the heart, but follows the set of individual thoughts it includes. Here's an excerpt of 1 Locke's essay where he states the personal individuality would follow the thoughts themselves, rather than the thinking product.
" Let anybody reflect after himself, and conclude, that he has in himself an immaterial Heart, which is that which considers in him, and in the frequent change of his body helps to keep him the same;which is that which he calling himself: Let him also assume it to be the same soul, that was at Nestor or Thersites, at the Siege Of Troy. But he, now having no awareness of the Activities either of Nestor or Thersites, does, or can he, conceive himself the same person with either of these? Can he get worried in either of the actions?Attribute them to himself, or think them his own more than the actions of other man, that ever before existed?But let him once find himself conscious of any of the actions of Nestor, then detects himself the same person with Nestor. "(Section 15). Since we know and read that Locke rejects that the identification of a person is the identity of your immaterial compound or heart and soul. For Locke at every instant you might have an alternative soul, thoughts, or another type of thinker but still have the same person see. (Section 25)
Another rejection by Locke is the idea the the id of a guy is needed for the personal information of the person. It wouldn't be necessary because you might have the same person in two different beings as he states in the Prince and the Cobbler history.
"For should the soul of your prince, carrying with it the awareness of the prince's previous life, enter and inform the body of any cobbler, as soon as deserted by his own heart and soul, everyone sees he would be the same person with the prince. "(Section 15).
For Locke personal individuality is not enough if it generally does not include the identity of consciousness. Regarding to Locke awareness is the ideas a soul entertains, not in the soul that entertains them. The most important part of awareness is storage, since memory can keep in mind the actions and activities of some past person, from the point of view of this person, the other thereby qualifies as equivalent with see your face. To Locke he represents personal individuality as a "forensic" notion. (Section 26). Some philosophers and idea get confused along with his identity of awareness Locke stated"For since consciousness always accompanies thinking, which is that which makes every one to be what he message or calls self, and in so doing distinguishes himself from all other pondering things:in this along consists consists personal personality and as far as this consciousness can be prolonged backwards to any previous action or thought, up to now reaches the identification of this person;it's the same self now it was then;which is by the same personal with this present the one which now reflects onto it, that that action was done. "(Section 9).
Overtime John Locke has been criticized by his theories and his way of thinking by fellow philosophers and other entities. Thomas Reid has a view that is comparable to Descartes in which a one who is a simple indivisible element that does not have any temporal or spatial parts. Thomas Reid expresses that "My personal identity implies the continued life of this indivisible thing that i can myself. Whatever this self may be, it is something which thinks, and deliberates, and resolves, and functions and suffers. I am not thought, I am not action, I am not action, I am not sense;I am something that thinks, and works and suffers. My thoughts, and actions, and thoughts change every moment;they have no continues, but a successive, existence that do it yourself or I, to which they belong, is permanent, and gets the same relation to all the succeeding thoughts, actions, and feelings which I call mine. " Reid argues that storage is the data for personal identity, but not the basis of personal id. Reid developed several arguments which not in favor of John Locke's ram is the basis of personal identity. The four main quarrels that Reide moves against Locke are:
The Duplication problem which says one individual may be personality with more than one individual.
The Brave Soldier Paradox which a guy may be, and at the same time not be, the individual that did a specific action.
The issue of taking away reward punishment and responsibility.
The slight objection that confuses consciousness with storage area.
