The fourteenth and fifteenth ages marked key points in the introduction of both the Spanish and the Ottoman empires. The building of the Spanish and the Ottoman Empires are both similar and various in lots of ways. With the breakthrough of the Americas and the conquering of Constantinople, both empires were rising as world powers. Furthermore, both empires progressed into strong spiritual empires. One major difference was the reason why for conquest between your two vast empires. The Spanish desired to improve trade whereas the Ottoman Empire wanted military services control.
There were also many similarities and differences in the way the Spanish and the Ottoman Empires developed politically. The Spanish used the Encomienda System as a base for economic and political order in the Americas. Using this technique, the men who dished up the crown, or the encomenderos, were granted area of the labor and produce of the natives. The Spanish king ruled through the Council of the Indies, allowing the king to appoint viceroys. Furthermore, the Spanish king could oversee the treasury office and the royal court of appeals, or audiencia. In contrast, the Ottoman Empire developed a bureaucracy, and because of religious tolerance allowed Christians and Jews to take part in the federal government.
The Spanish and the Ottoman Empires can be likened and contrasted economically. One difference between your two empires was taxing in the Ottoman Empire. Although the Ottoman Empire was tolerant of other religions, they enforced a special tax on non Muslims called the jizya. One similarity was the establishment of trade routes in both empires. The Spanish Empire founded trade routes to the Americas and the Ottoman Empire, under the guideline of Suleyman, extended populations, roads, and trade routes. Suleyman led the Ottoman Empire to the Pax Ottomanica, resulting in the golden time that allowed the empire to flourish. Furthermore, the Ottoman Empire controlled fifty percent of the Danube River, allowing them to control trade.
Socially, both the Spanish and the Ottoman Empires were very rigid spiritual empires. The Spanish were tight Catholics (maybe tolerant). Likewise, the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire was a devout Muslim. The Spanish spread Christianity throughout the Americas, changing Natives very much like the way the Ottomans converted boys in poor villages top rank janissaries. However, the two empires do differ for the reason that the Ottoman Empire was tolerant of other religions. The Ottoman Empire tolerated other religions because by allowing the Christians and Jews to apply their religions freely, the Ottoman Turks could protect themselves against revolts and rebellions. One major difference between the two empires was their reasons for growth and conquest. The Spanish Empire expanded to help expand promote trade, whereas the Ottoman Empire broadened for military services control. Under a system known as devshirme the Ottoman Sultan curved up boys between the age groups of 12 and 20 from villages and trained the best ten percent to be civil servants or military services men known as janissaries. However a similarity can be found in the decline of the two empires, where both empires finished because of the implications of the systems they searched for to improve in development. The Spanish, in attempts to improve trade began to decline because of a weak financial foundation, unable to reap the benefits associated with trade. Likewise, when the growth of the Ottoman Empire ceased, the empire lacked the influx of manpower to supply its system of retaining an efficient human population of civil servants and armed service men. A serial armed service defeat followed afterwards.
During the periods of 1450 to 1800, the building of the Spanish and the Ottoman Empire developed in similar and various ways. Politically, the Spanish used an encomienda system whereas the Ottomans developed a bureaucratic federal. Economically, the Spanish and the Ottoman developed trade routes, but the Spanish didn't impose the jizya as the Ottomans do. Socially, both empires were purely religious but the Ottomans were more tolerant of other religions. Despite their emergence as world power, both empires dropped consequently of the Spanish's failure to develop a solid financial bottom and the Ottoman's failing to continue preserving a regular manpower.
Whereas the Spanish easily conquered the brand new World, the Ottomans constantly struggled differing people from Africa, Asia, and European countries. Ottoman culture was divided politically into wealth producers, military, Muslims, and non-Muslims. Under a system known as devshirme the Sultan curved up boys between the age range of 12 and 20 from villages and trained the best 10 % to be civil servants or armed forces men known as janissaries.
After the relatively easier early conquest, Spanish legislation prohibited exploration and enslavement of Indians in its New Laws of 1542. In Mexico and Peru the decree was overlooked and lead to a controversy about how precisely the colonies should be run, with some visible ruling course arguing that Indians should be cured with protection and care, while others argued for a slavery system. The Ottoman Empire was less enlightened in ideology, but ruled with brute penalties for criminal serves, and efficient administration ad legal strategies. The Sultan considered himself supreme as compared against other monarchs.
Indians died because of disease, dislocation, and the rigors of mine work following the European conquest. When the Spanish monarch concluded the encomienda system the colonists significantly sought give of lands creating rural estates that produced social products. Eventually, the Americas progressed into an economical base that facilitates Spain. For the Ottoman Empire, its decline was drastic. If the expansion ceased, the empire lacked the influx of manpower to nourish its system of maintaining an efficient inhabitants of civil servants and armed forces men. A serial armed service defeat followed soon after.
