In order to achieve the aim and aim of a job in an company, the best way to determine a powerful organisation is to use a suitable management methods. This statement is to describe and summarize the major tendencies in management approaches which people are always utilizing in their task organisation. A couple of four types of management approaches will be point out clearly in this survey include classical methodology, human relation procedure, system procedure and contingency strategy. From management approaches examination shall be carry out at exactly the same time in order to choose and clarify the most effective in promoting a good organisational framework and organisational connections. Besides, a good head is also important to leading the team in achieving the organisation goals. Thus, the qualities to be a good innovator will be discuss and identified as well.
Types of management approaches
Management plays a crucial role in the making of the company and for that reason effective management is required to ensure every organisation is working towards a standard aim or goal. Hence, it is essential to produce a good organisation composition and organisation relatioship. The four different major types of management solutions will discuss in the next.
Classical Approach
Classical approach is principally concentrate of the employees and organisations based on management practices, that have been on results of careful observation. Classical approach mainly searches for economical efficiency with the common principles of procedure. (Abhijith 2011) In a very management sense, classical approach is tried to develop and operate general ideas or models that will applied in every circumstances. Basically, this approach wants the simplest way which they believed can be open through logical method. (Sharon 1997)
According to Laurie J. Mullins (2005) also pointed out that the traditional approach is encouraged the methodical view of the management and provide some common general principles applicable to all or any organisation circumstances. Classical approach can be labeled into three management includes technological management, administrative management and bureaucratic management.
Scientific management
According to Taylor (1856-1915), clinical management was a theory of management that analysed the objective of increasing the labour efficiency. Taylor also mentioned that management of business, industry or market must be according to concepts of efficiency from the tests and operation in ways of work and development. Besides, Taylor also insisted that the way in which of change in general management could be determined by scientific study. (Abhijith 2011)
Taylor believed that the management could be formulated as an academic discipline and the best results could come from the collaboration between qualified management and a trained. The key idea of methodical management includes time and motion studies, standardization of management, useful foremanship and differential part rate system. (francis 1908) Matching to Sharon Jones (1997) also stated that clinical management is relied on increased device to be subdivided into highly specilised and usual task which mean need to select the right people for the right job along with his abilities, so the best method of doing a job can be achieved and leading to increasing production range.
Bureaucracy Management
Bureaucracy is the name associated with an organisation used by organisation design pros. Bureaucracy described a set of characteristics or features who offer with or who work with the organisations. Inside the 1930 Potential Weber, a German sociologist described the bureaucracy as being a way of organising government organizations. (Gaurav 2011) The characteristics of bureaucracy management is dependant on the rational power would become more adaptable to changes. (Abhijith 2011) Besides, system of written guidelines and standard operating types of procedures are recommended to provide certainty and facilitate coordination. Impersonal relationship is maintained between your professionals and employees. In addition, only competence people are hiring for jobs based on their competence and specialized skills. (Mullins 2007)
Human Relation Approach
Human relation strategy was focus on framework and the formal oraganisation, however the social factors at work and behaviour of workers within an company need to pay better attention. This method much more centered on the workmanships themselves and their satisfactory needs. They'll ensured that the environment of their workplace give a completely safety safeguards. (Mullins 2007) This process also worked on self-confidence with their workforce. (Patterson 1958) Besides, it does mean people go to work to gain recognition, understanding and not simply simply for financial profits. Thus, professionals should understanding the thoughts and feeling of the personnel and not cured them as machine. (Bratton et al. 2007)
Neo-Human Relation Approach
According to Laurie J. Mullins (2005), the neo-human relationships are concentrate on the personal adjustment of people within the framework of the organization and ramifications of group interactions and authority styles. It provided rise to several famous theories, including Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, which suggests that staff are determined to meet basic needs at five levels. Then, it also includes physiological, safety, love, esteem and self-actualization. This process also contains Theory X and Theory Y. A project should therefore offer bonuses to employees to be able to fulfil and improve up the hierarchy. (Wan 2012) Attention shall be extracted from the organisation composition, job satisfaction, communication, motivation and leadership styles.
System Approach
The characteristic about a system is the component from which it is made up. The word "developed" would suggest that a development is somehow man-made and this is the meaning to be exhibiting. Something also to be a whole made up of elements that are related to one another. (Wouter et al. 2002) It seeks to understand how they interact with one another and how they could be helped bring into proper romance for the ideal solution of the situation. The systems strategy relates the technology to the necessity, the communal to the scientific aspects. (Simon & Robin 1998) The discussion has two components which is source and output. Suggestions is use to gets into the system from the outside whereas for the result is use to leaves the system for the surroundings. In order to differentiate about the within and outside of a system, the machine itself and its own environment shall be distinguished and separated by the boundary. (Heylighen 1998)
Contingency Approach
According to Mullins, L (2005), in the contingency strategy there is no person easiest way of planning an company and composition management but should provide insights into that particular situation and circumstances that will have an impact on the management decision. Besides, he stated that this approach gets the view of 'if-then' romance. "If certain situational factors are present, then certain factors in organisation structure and systems of management are most appropriate" (Mullins 2007, p. 604) Contingency procedure is an extension of the systems procedure. There is no-one optimum state. The best option structure and system of management is therefore centered following the contingencies situation for every organization. The director need make an effort to identify which technique would be the best solution for a problem. Example is the situation of increasing productivity. (Nikmahajan 2007)
The Most Efficiency Management Approach
Effectiveness is concerned with doing the correct things which is focus on outputs and the successes required. Effectiveness management strategy will deliver a good organisational framework and marriage through their situation or circumstances. By firmly taking under consideration through the reviews and research of the various management approach, I then found out that contingency strategy is the very best in promoting a good organisational framework and organisational human relationships as compare to other management approach. This is because contingency way has no one best design of organisation although it is a kind of composition, management, and success of the company dependent upon a range of situational factors. (Mullins 2007)
As we realize that sometimes an organisation would come out the issue, argument, and issue. To overcome the situation, contingency way is the most effective to control it because this approach is not seek to suggest a one best way to do the thing or manage the structure organisation but should provide some other situational and affects of management decisions. (Mullins 2007) Then, contingency way seeks to apply the situations ideas drawn from various circumstances management. In traditional approach, system approach and human relation approach all of this way have their own managerial decision through the organisation structure and relationship whereas because of this contingency approach it consider of no-one methodology is universally appropriate and different problem and situations required different management styles. In order to achieve their goals or target, contingency strategy can be study the relationship between the internal and external environment circumstances of an company. (Nikmahajan 2007)
Unlike other management way, different strategy will have their different guidelines and particular rule of management styles. A number of the management way for example traditional strategy is more concentrate on formal structure, technical requirements of the organisation and general models of principles. It is more concentrate on universal rules in their circumstances also to develop a best way for their organisation structure and management. (Sharon 1997) While for the real human relation methodology was emphasis on framework and the formal oraganisation, and the sociable factors at work and behaviour of workers in a company need to pay greater attention. This approach probably focused and centered on the workmanships themselves and their acceptable needs and the rules and principle of management is set for their organisation. (Mullins 2007) Then, the system procedure is differentiated with a view of the organisation as separate parts. The systems procedure relates the technology to the need, the cultural to the technical aspects and the two components are input and outcome. (Simon & Robin 1998) As compare between your three management methodology and contingency way, it show that contingency procedure is more flexible and the management decision will looking on different situation with different management styles as the three management strategy is more focus on particular aspect and lack of flexibility.
The size of organisation will also have an impact on the management decision. In a little organisation it'll employed informal organisational structure while large company used formal organisational composition. Through the use of contingency approach, supervisor can point control all finished. done in a small organisation whereas for the top organisation manager required more technical and indirect chain of command. (Tyson and Jackson 1992) For the exterior environment of your organisation such as technology and markets, the contingency management way will produce a well organisation under the uncertainty circumstances. (Fryer 1997) As we know the contingency procedure is versatile organising and handling so that a manager could build-up the most suitable and proper organisational composition and romance for the technology and market competitive.
With the contingency management approach, it will offer an possibility to integrate perspectives from management and marketing. Supervisor can assess possible option to promote the most suitable and proper organisational structure and interactions that concentrate on marker demand and company sights. Besides, it is just a adaptable management with the different management styles and structure in an organisation.
Attributes To be always a Good Leader
Leadership can be defined as ability to affects others to willingly follow training. A head must has a definite vision of where you can go and how to accomplish and success it. A head must also talk clearly and passionately. A good leader must have the self-control to work toward his or her eye-sight inspection as well as his / her eyesight is toward the action of obtaining goals and purpose. There are a few of the attributes to be always a good leader that may explain further in the next.
First, a good leader will be integrity towards all the situations and decision making. Integrity is the essential that will keep everything in a right way and secure. Without integrity, sometimes thing will break down critically. Integrity will allows a leader to shows or suppose important characteristics about how their performance and works done in virtually any circumstances. Because of this it will facilitate trust that may leads to a higher efficiency. Second, a good leader must know how to do a good judgement. A good judgement means a great decision making. Sometimes a judgement is reasonable simple but thing come to the decision it make people quite sophisticated and stress. As a result a good innovator must make sure the judgement is correctly and in the right time. Third, a good head is important in the enthusiasm because she or he will create positive energy and influencing. A leader's enthusiasm will attract fans and become catalyst for the forming of highly motivated groups. Sometimes there is always a conflict in an company so that innovator shall assist and show their high passion although the organisation is in the conflict situation. (Michael 2011)
Then, a good leader should have a good visionary. It's important for a head to define, encourage a sensible, easily understand when eyesight something different and conform the circumstances change. Market leaders must be able to anticipate and take into account the future and how they'll guide and conform their business performance when they faced on uncertainty or unfamiliar circumstances. From then on, a good innovator shall have a good communicative with one another. A leader should give a consistent, obviously and optimistic communication to all levels in just a company. To become an efficient communicator, a head should have also a good listener. By the end, people who feel that information is shared with them stay in their jobs and more encouraged. (Kevin 2005)
Besides, a good leader shall be in touch with their employees. They must let their workers know and believe that their innovator is keep in touch with them that will give them a feeling of security and calms the mental. When the psychological is less, sometimes the mind can be considering new information and ideas and responds better to others. Furthermore, a good innovator shall keep their emotions in check. Leader must use their thoughts to help for your choice making or practice psychological intelligent skill. It is useful because it will recognise their thoughts and try not to show to other folks. Within the other hands, a good decision making skills also dependence on a good leader. As a head focusing on how to make logical decision at the end they will know how to make decision to leading others. To be able to sharpen their decision making skills, they need to determine consequences for each possible solution and rehearsing identifying problems. (Marilee 2011)
As a final result, attributes to be always a good leader is very important for any company or employment. All these aspect play an important role in the company management. If the first choice is not capable to handle the situation or problem well, it'll affect the whole system in the company from workers to the management level. To make sure an organisation or occupation is success, a good head is the main to leading towards attaining the objective and goals.
Conclusion
After the studies about the management methods, every one of the management approaches such as traditional, human connection, system and contingency strategy have their own rules and guidelines of management. Because of this, the contingency way is the most effective to enhance the organisation framework and relationship since it is versatility to managing and organising as compare to other way. The adaptable of the contingency approach enable the company itself to conform the changes happen from the internal and external environment circumstances. Besides, to be always a good leader she or he should be apply an important attributes and provides well performance to do something as a good innovator. Inside the other hands, a good head shall taken care of their fans in a good position and become smart to conquer or fixing problem on each different situation and also learned about the various of control styles and dedication to each other.
