Developing one's personality is a lifelong process. This is of self-identity, according to psychology is the mindful recognition of the do it yourself as having a unique identity. I chose to target my research on the region of adolescent individuality, or junior between 12 and 19 years of age, because then so many huge decisions are made that affect a person's life and the direction where it is going.
Upon my research, I have discovered that is an ever before evolving theory. There is certainly a lot research and information on this particular subject, that it couldn't possibly be covered in one newspaper. Many of the theorists build on one another. Henri Tajfel's adeveloped social identification theory. Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development is one of the best-known ideas of personality (Cherry, 2012). And Urie Bronfenbrenner developed the ecological systems theory to explain how everything in a child and the child's environment affects how children increase and develop. You will discover many other theorist who have affected the way we look at personality as well. And there are many theorists in whom the aforementioned theorists have detected and built upon. Erikson's theory has periods, much like Freud and Piaget. One theorist who elaborated on Erikson's theory was Adam Marcia.
Tajfel's research consisted of two laboratory experiments that focused on in-groups and out-groups to look for the discrimination of out-groups and the inherent self-esteem boost the members received when they granted their own groupings, even though these were anonymous, with the most money. He established that there are three techniques used to judge others as "us" or "them" or in other words, in-groups and out-groups, and that these processes happen in a specific order. First is categorization. We categorize items in order to comprehend and identify them, this consists of our interpersonal environment. We find things out about ourselves according to the categories we participate in. The second level is social id. Once categorized to an organization, each folks forms our personal information predicated on our owned by the group and create an psychological bond. After that, we affix our self-esteem to the group membership. The final stage is social comparability. Once our group is produced and we've grouped ourselves, and developed an personal information mounted on that group, we tend to compare our group with other organizations. Our self-esteem in covered up in this group, so we need to ensure that we are viewed as beneficial in the eye of other groupings. If we are not, then hostility and competition forms between groups to determine the "better" group or groups.
Essentially, we have been struggling for our personality. This is also true for young adults. There are so many organizations that determine young people's personality. Religion, competition, gender, activities, etc. all play an important role in how people specify themselves.
The next theorist is Erik Erikson. He established all of his work on circumstance studies, and sometimes was criticized for his insufficient formal research. Some sensed that he lacked trustworthiness because of his lack of research, but Erikson structured his stage-theory on what he had seen in his life as well as circumstance studies. The introduction of ego personal information is one of the primary elements of Erikson's psychosocial stage theory. Ego individuality is the idea that we develop a mindful sense of self through social discussion. Due to new information and activities that we acquire every day during our interpersonal relationships with others, our ego identification is constantly changing. Erikson also felt that conducts and actions were encouraged by a feeling of competence. Erikson assumed that each stage can create competence or turmoil, or a turning point in one's development. Each quantitative level presents its own achievements and issues. The phases are as follows, with a focus on Identity versus misunderstanding, but because his theory is built on stages, it's important to say the stages leading up to the adolescent id stage. The first is Trust vs. Mistrust, because a child is entirely dependant on their caregiver, they create a sense of trust if they're properly looked after, or mistrust if they are neglected, rejected, or abused. The second stage is Autonomy vs. Shame and Uncertainty. This stage identifies potty training and food choice. When children effectively complete this stage they either feel secure and self-assured or insufficient or uncertainty themselves. The 3rd stage is Effort vs. Guilt. These are the preschool years when they get started to assert themselves and discover a sense of control and vitality over others. If successful they feel capable, if they fail they believe that sense of self doubt and guilt. Level four is Industry vs. Inferiority. A feeling of pride commences to develop as children recognize their achievements and capabilities through their communal interactions. When children are prompted by their parents and educators they create a sense of competence and a notion in their capabilities. This brings us to the stage of Individuality vs. Confusion. This is the important stage, at least as far as we are worried. During their adolescent years, children develop a sense of home by exploring their independence. There are several contributing factors to the forming of identity. As children enter into puberty their cognitive skills and physical skills increase. When teens become more impartial they have a tendency to try more neighborhood, community and school activities. Erikson assumed these changes make children start to explore their future jobs, their relationships and their beliefs. Regarding to Erikson, id has been created whenever a person can examine themselves and their environment and links them alongside one another expressively. When a person challenges with this individuality link, that is when the issues of role bafflement occurs. Role confusion causes a person to question their characteristics, their sense of home and their perceptions of others. Because of changing physical, cognitive, and interpersonal factors, almost all adolescents experience some type of role dilemma (Kroger, 2004, as quoted by Sokol, 2009).
Identity helps each of us to find our devote the world. It provides us with a feeling of belonging, a sense of self, and provides us each a sense of direction. Identification is what makes us move in a particular direction. Identity is what gives us cause to be. Erikson clearly assumed that having a good sense of personality is crucial to help expand development. With out a true sense of identification, adolescents tend to choose a lifestyle that has negative implications, because they lack self respect or feel that they don't have earned a much better life.
The theorist Wayne Marcia, predicated on Erikson's theory, developed four Id Statuses of internal personal information. His main idea is the fact personal options and their cultural commitments determine ones personal information. It is important to clarify that these are NOT phases, but statuses that can happen in any order or never. Marcia's four statuses are, first, Identification Diffusion, this is when an adolescent doesn't feel like they have a choice in things pertaining to themselves, when the truth is, they just haven't made one, or is not ready in those days to produce a commitment to one choice or another. Second, is Personality Foreclosures, this is when an adolescent is happy to meet others by investing in certain roles, principles, or plans for the future. This isn't an identity crisis; these individuals are just choosing to conform to what others want to them. The third position is Identity Moratorium, which is when the adolescent is at a crisis, this is when a teenager is ready to bother making a choice, but has not committed to some of those options yet. The ultimate status is Identity Achievement, this is when a teenager has gone via an identity turmoil and has focused on a decision and developed a feeling of identity based on that choice.
We have all experienced this inside our lives. There is not an individual adult that can actually say that they went through their entire children knowing who they were and who these were going to become. It is a process, a learning curve. I daily work filled up with action and effect. Every day teenagers, and individuals, have to reevaluate certain areas of their identification bases on what works and what fails.
Our last theorist is Bronfenbrenner, his theory is that every aspect of life, every little piece of our existence influences who we are. We could each in the middle of a giant group. Directly around us is our microsystem, this requires our families, school, everything we see and package with daily. Next is the exosystem, this is the pieces of one's life out of these immediate range, such as parents work place, prolonged family, neighborhoods, etc. The final group is the macrosystem, that's where culture and attitudes come into play, for example, conflict, the current economic climate, and federal. Although these things are beyond your individual's personal group, they are still affective in molding and shaping adolescent personal information.
To sum up every one of the research and ideas above, it is safe to state that every facet of one's life comes with an impact on a person's identity in a single way or another. Through their upbringing, culture, cultural functions, and environment, adolescents develop their id. They learn to count on those they can trust and build perceptions about things that they know and things that they don't really know. Their cognitive capabilities have reached a spot in the adolescent years where they can determine for themselves their own paths based on their own views and views, even though much of their thought procedures are damaged by the values which have been instilled in them. Parents and caregivers play a significant role on religion, social position, environment, education and future. Teachers also play a role in the development of a teenager's identity. Through the use of clear targets and positive compliment, a instructor can increase their student's self-esteem. They also have the capability to encourage positive group choices through group projects and student consciousness. Teachers are also powerful role models and can create a strong learning environment that encourages cognitive progress and can boost the desire for students to pursue higher education. Instructors can change lives in their student's lives and help them develop a strong sense of self applied and identity. The most important thing a educator can do is to learn their students.
Resources
Cherry, K (2012). Levels of psychosocial development: Psychosocial development in
preschool, middle Youth, and adolescence. Retrieved from http://psychology. about. com/od/ psychosocialtheories/a/psychosocial_2. htm
Feinstein, S. (2007). Instructing the at-risk teenage brain. Retrieved from http://chapters. scarecrowpress. com/15/788/1578866 464ch1. pdf
Gilgun, J (1993). Erik erikson and the use of circumstance studies. Retrieved from
http://www. scribd. com/doc/38414815/Erik-Erikson-Case-Study-Research
Marcia, J. E. , (1966), Development and validation of ego id position, Journal of
Personality and Community Mindset 3, pp. 551-558. Retrieved from http://iws2. collin. edu/lstern/JamesMarcia. pdf
McLeod, S. A. (2008). Social personal information theory. Retrieved from http://www. simply
psychology. org/social-identity-theory. html
Sokol, Justin T. (2009) "Identity Development Through the entire Life time: An Exam of
Eriksonian Theory, " Graduate Journal of Counselling Mindset: Vol. 1: Iss. 2, Article
14. Retrieved from http://epublications. marquette. edu/gjcp/vol1/iss2/14
Tahfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223,
96-102 Retrieved from http://www. holah. karoo. net/tajfestudy. htm
Woolfolk, a. , Perry, N. (2012). Child and adolescent development. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education Inc.
