First of all it is necessary to answer fully the question what an abortion is? Abortion is the termination of any motherhood by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of any fetus or embryo, leading to or caused by its death. Observing this subject matter we can easily see that there are many different things of views for this question and there are, seemingly, three main positions on the issue of abortion. At one extreme we see the followers of "preserving life" (individuals who have pro-life position) who ban abortions in all circumstances: they believe that the government might not exactly encourage the damage of the embryo or fetus, legalizing abortion. At the other extreme are advocates of "free choice" (pro-choice position): they think that the law shouldn't restrict the independence of choice for the mother, because all pregnant women should have the chance to require an abortion. Intermediate position is occupied by those who consider abortion is permissible only in certain instances (for example, when the motherhood is dangerous for the mother's life or was the consequence of rape or incest), as well as those who think that it will not be the key method of contraceptive.
In this part we are going to concern our attention on pro-choice abortion and regarding to Colker, we see that "Pro-choice abortion is the belief that women hold the to choose to abort a child using their company body. The "pro-choice" view is a baby does not have human protection under the law within the mother's womb. The people of america never voted on or backed this pro-choice position. Actually, it was the U. S. Supreme Court that "legalized" abortion because of this of Roe vs. Wade on January 22, 1973. " (Colker, 1992). Analyzing modern-day situation it becomes obvious that movement for the legalization of abortion lately has also turn into a well-organized and politically active push: it is supported by a series of specially created organizations nationwide, and tens of major religious groups.
Opponents of the ban on abortion submit four main honest arguments:
1. No individual shall be eligible for compel a woman to protect the motherhood against her will.
2. We should not give beginning to unwanted children.
3. Abortion was never subjected to the ban, if the legislators weren't men. (Or, as you aphorism says, "if men could easily get pregnant, abortion protection under the law would be looked at sacred. ")
4. If a woman has no to freely get rid of own body, including control of reproductive function, then there is absolutely no real freedom in any way.
Advocates of abortion protection under the law typically result from the actual fact that the federal government shouldn't intervene in the privateness of women deciding for them the fate of a being pregnant. They think that every woman should have an option - to abort or not, at the same time, they stress that such choice will not force one to a specific decision. In addition, it is mentioned that nobody should be needed by law to risk own health, yet at the entire prohibition of abortion, many women that are pregnant face the hazards of childbearing and childbirth, as well as unsafe criminal abortions.
What followers of pro-choice position have to state about how to cope with the to self-actualization of the fetus, using its right to life, with its right to the quest for happiness? Pro-choice followers proceed from the concept of cultural development of personality. Since the fetus has no idea about own future, about own personality, then it can't be self-consciousness. Once there is no consciousness, then the concept of consent to it is not appropriate. (Jelen & Wilcox, 2003). Are these arguments are definitely more persuasive than the quarrels against abortion? No one will surely say "yes" or "no", since there is no one single view on this issue in contemporary culture.
Thinking about different points of take on pro-life and pro-choice abortion Levitt & Dubner mentioned that pro-choice position allows to regulate unlawful situation in the united states. They discussed that decades of research signify that children from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to become crooks than others. (Levitt & Dubner, 2005). Thus, abortions allow to control criminal situation in the country because of their distance impact, because years later, these unborn children are not replenished the rates of thieves and crime stopped.
Debating this subject matter and looking at the situation from moral and psychological side we should bear in mind about the problem that the girl, who decided to make abortion, found herself in mental health turmoil, and sometimes she actually is also found herself in a great despair, but we can contradict to above mentioned women other pregnant girl who await their infants and are packed with happiness and enthusiasm that in the nearest future they'll become mothers and will see their little newborns. There are many different people, and different situations, but there exists one adjustable - child's life It's important to believe deeply about how it can happen that a child for just one woman - is a great grief and they are ready to pay money for child's death, but for others - child's beginning is so excellent that each goes to any expenses to truly have a baby. It is a explanation of dual persona of one situation around child's life
Thus, relating to Staggenborg, "despite all the support for abortion, one of quite pro-choice facts is the fact those who increase pro choice issues to reinforce their cause aren't expert abortion. They take the to as a woman's flexibility to her body and life. However, we should understand that abortion shouldn't cloud the sanctity of life. It is important to bear in mind the professionals and downsides of abortions before taking any decisions regarding one's motherhood. " (Staggenborg, 1994).
Taking into consideration all the above stated you'll be able to conclude that in speaking about the moral aspects of abortion we usually used many quarrels in favor of one or another position. Whatever our personal view, it is important to have the ability to recognize the ways of argumentation in honest reasoning, which the truth is is not as logical as it can seem initially. It's important to remember that each human child should be desired, nurtured, cherished and cherished. So birth control and abortion will be the part of necessary plan in this direction. Choices in this case should belong to the pregnant female, in support of her wish to save or not to save a child should be the primary argument in pro-choice position.
